John Rees

589 citations
21 papers · 185 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

John Rees

19 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

John Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Political Science and International Relations 76
  • Philosophy 26
  • Public Administration 8
  • Sociology and Political Science 98
  • History 20
Replace Robert Ginsberg with:
Robert Ginsberg United States
Helmut Dubiel Germany
Franklin Hugh Adler United States
John M. Mulder United States
Wilson Carey McWilliams United States
J. William Fulbright United States
Hugh Brogan United Kingdom
George Crowder Australia
Stephen B. Oates United States
Harold E. Quinley United States
John Rees relative to Robert Ginsberg United States Robert Ginsberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Ginsberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rees. The network helps show where John Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Rees Line = papers co-authored together John Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20172
2 20122
3
A People's History of London
20121
4
Timelines: A Political History of the Modern World
20121
5 200611
6
A defence of history and class consciousness : tailism and the dialectic
200249
7
'The Centre cannot hold': Fascism, the left and the crisis of French politics
20023
8 20023
9
The Algebra of Revolution: The Dialectic and the Classical Marxist Tradition
199836
10 19982
11
Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill's Essay on Government, MacAulay's Critique and the Ensuing Debate
199617
12
Marxism and the Great French Revolution
19892
13 19774
14 19633
15 196033
16 19583
17 19568
18 19562
19 19541
20 19531

About John Rees

John Rees is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Law, having authored 21 papers that have together received 185 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (5 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (76 citations), Philosophy (26 citations), Public Administration (8 citations), Sociology and Political Science (98 citations) and History (20 citations). John Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Slavoj Žižek, Esther Leslie, György Lukács, Thomas Babington Macaulay Macaulay, Jack Lively, James Mill and Alex Callinicos. Their work appears in journals such as Political Studies, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, British Journal of Sociology, Mind and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026