R. J. Schoeck

597 citations
53 papers · 152 indexed · h-index 6
Topics
Medieval Literature and History (9 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers)

In The Last Decade

R. J. Schoeck

34 papers receiving 81 citations

Peers

R. J. Schoeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • History 71
  • Classics 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 28
  • Literature and Literary Theory 20
Replace Lowrie J. Daly with:
Lowrie J. Daly Canada
Bennett D. Hill United States
Mary Martin McLaughlin United States
Janel Mueller United States
James Kinsley United Kingdom
Charles Carlton United States
Edward Surtz United States
Christine de Pizan
Mervyn Evans James United Kingdom
Delno C. West United States
R. J. Schoeck relative to Lowrie J. Daly Canada Lowrie J. Daly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lowrie J. Daly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. J. Schoeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. J. Schoeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. J. Schoeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. J. Schoeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. J. Schoeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. J. Schoeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. J. Schoeck. The network helps show where R. J. Schoeck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. J. Schoeck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. J. Schoeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. J. Schoeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. J. Schoeck. R. J. Schoeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Acta conventus neo-latini bononiensis: proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies : Bologna, 26 August to 1 September 1979
1
2 1
3
Erasmus of Europe
3
4 0
5
"That Most Erudite of Tudor Lawyers,' Christopher St. German
1
6 0
7 0
8 1
9 0
10 1
11 0
12 0
13 1
14 2
15 1
16 0
17 4
18 2
19 3
20 1

About R. J. Schoeck

R. J. Schoeck is a scholar working on Classics, History and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 152 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (44 citations), History (71 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). R. J. Schoeck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. H. Hexter, M. DOMINICA LEGGE, G. L. Brook, J. Max Patrick, Robert O. Evans, John M. Wallace, Arthur J. Slavin, Morris W. Croll, Charles Fantazzi and Paul John Eakin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Modern Language Review and Sixteenth Century Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026