Mark Hulliung
Impact in
- History top 5%
- European Political History Analysis
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
- Philosophy top 5%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Papers in
- History 8
- European Political History Analysis 4
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
-
- Political Theory and Influence 7
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- Co-authors
- Wayne A. Rebhorn (1 shared paper)Emmet Kennedy (1 shared paper)Roy C. Macridis (1 shared paper)Nannerl O. Keohane (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (3 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (2 papers)Society (1 paper)Political Theory (1 paper)The Review of Politics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Hulliung
14 papers receiving 82 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- History 49
- Philosophy 40
- Political Science and International Relations 68
- Anthropology 11
- History and Philosophy of Science 4
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hulliung
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hulliung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hulliung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hulliung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hulliung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hulliung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hulliung. The network helps show where Mark Hulliung may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hulliung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 7 | Las ideologías políticas contemporáneas : regímenes y movimientos | 1998 | 2 |
| 8 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 0 |
About Mark Hulliung
Mark Hulliung is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 20 papers that have together received 122 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (49 citations), Philosophy (40 citations), Political Science and International Relations (68 citations), Anthropology (11 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (4 citations). Mark Hulliung has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wayne A. Rebhorn, Emmet Kennedy, Roy C. Macridis and Nannerl O. Keohane. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Society, Political Theory and The Review of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.