Andrew Reeve
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Alan WareRichard AshcraftPeter BurnellHillel SteinerJack LivelyOscar Del Rio HerreroTerry V. ClappJohn Cunliffe
- Topics
- Political Economy and Marxism (6 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Andrew Reeve
24 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Political Science and International Relations 137
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Philosophy 60
- Economics and Econometrics 32
- Law 24
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Reeve
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Reeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Reeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Reeve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Reeve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Reeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Reeve. The network helps show where Andrew Reeve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Reeve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Reeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Reeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Reeve. Andrew Reeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Real libertarianism assessed: political theory after Van Parijs | 8 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Electoral Systems: A Comparative and Theoretical Introduction | 31 |
| 10 | Electoral Systems: A Theoretical and Comparative Introduction | 1 |
| 11 | Modern theories of exploitation | 72 |
| 12 | Exploitation: A Liberal Theory Amended, Defended and Extended | 6 |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Andrew Reeve
Andrew Reeve is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (137 citations), Philosophy (60 citations) and Law (24 citations). Andrew Reeve has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alan Ware, Richard Ashcraft, Peter Burnell, Hillel Steiner, Jack Lively, Oscar Del Rio Herrero, Terry V. Clapp and John Cunliffe. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Political Studies and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.