J W Wise

1.9k total citations
30 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

J W Wise is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, J W Wise has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 10 papers in Food Science and 9 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in J W Wise's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (27 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (14 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers). J W Wise is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (27 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (14 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers). J W Wise collaborates with scholars based in United States. J W Wise's co-authors include J.W. Savell, J. D. Tatum, J. O. REAGAN, D. M. Wulf, H. R. Cross, Gary C. Smith, R. K. Miller, C. L. Lorenzen, M J Buyck and Jeremy F. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Food Science and Journal of Food Quality.

In The Last Decade

J W Wise

30 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J W Wise United States 20 1.3k 563 273 194 175 30 1.5k
C. L. Lorenzen United States 20 1.1k 0.8× 547 1.0× 128 0.5× 137 0.7× 198 1.1× 59 1.4k
R. L. West United States 20 1.4k 1.1× 400 0.7× 337 1.2× 126 0.6× 130 0.7× 52 1.7k
L.L. Gibson Canada 23 1.2k 1.0× 402 0.7× 157 0.6× 120 0.6× 143 0.8× 48 1.5k
A. J. Garmyn United States 19 1.1k 0.9× 532 0.9× 272 1.0× 105 0.5× 153 0.9× 87 1.4k
C. R. Kerth United States 21 1.1k 0.9× 489 0.9× 141 0.5× 137 0.7× 214 1.2× 95 1.5k
Linda Hoover United States 10 912 0.7× 325 0.6× 160 0.6× 87 0.4× 157 0.9× 22 1.2k
D. L. VanOverbeke United States 25 1.5k 1.2× 393 0.7× 240 0.9× 296 1.5× 128 0.7× 94 1.8k
Rod Polkinghorne Australia 26 1.8k 1.4× 717 1.3× 487 1.8× 290 1.5× 159 0.9× 71 2.2k
Christian Touraille Morocco 18 1.1k 0.8× 213 0.4× 150 0.5× 94 0.5× 92 0.5× 34 1.2k
R. J. Rathmann United States 17 962 0.8× 441 0.8× 149 0.5× 166 0.9× 125 0.7× 46 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by J W Wise

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J W Wise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J W Wise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J W Wise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J W Wise

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J W Wise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J W Wise. The network helps show where J W Wise may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J W Wise

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J W Wise. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J W Wise based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J W Wise. J W Wise is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Behrends, J.M., K. J. Goodson, M. Koohmaraie, et al.. (2005). Beef customer satisfaction: Factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation1. Journal of Animal Science. 83(12). 2869–2875. 28 indexed citations
2.
Behrends, J.M., K. J. Goodson, M. Koohmaraie, et al.. (2005). Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks1. Journal of Animal Science. 83(3). 662–670. 51 indexed citations
3.
Lorenzen, C. L., R. K. Miller, J. D. Tatum, et al.. (2003). Beef Customer Satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values1. Journal of Animal Science. 81(1). 143–149. 90 indexed citations
4.
Vote, D. J., K. E. Belk, J.A. Scanga, et al.. (2003). Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis1,2. Journal of Animal Science. 81(9). 2239–2246. 18 indexed citations
5.
Vote, D. J., K. E. Belk, J.A. Scanga, et al.. (2003). Accuracy and repeatability of beef carcass longissimus muscle area measurements. Journal of Animal Science. 81(8). 1980–1980. 17 indexed citations
7.
Goodson, K. J., W. W. Morgan, J. O. REAGAN, et al.. (2002). Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks. Journal of Animal Science. 80(2). 401–408. 83 indexed citations
8.
Lorenzen, C. L., R. K. Miller, J. D. Tatum, et al.. (1999). Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top loin steak.. Journal of Animal Science. 77(3). 637–637. 81 indexed citations
9.
Kerth, C. R., et al.. (1999). Accuracy of application of USDA beef quality and yield grades using the traditional system and the proposed seven-grade yield grade system.. Journal of Animal Science. 77(1). 116–116. 2 indexed citations
11.
Berg, E. P., et al.. (1999). Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.. Journal of Animal Science. 77(8). 1977–1977. 7 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Stephen E., J. D. Tatum, G. G. Hilton, et al.. (1998). Prediction of slaughter cow composition using live animal and carcass traits.. Journal of Animal Science. 76(6). 1594–1594. 12 indexed citations
13.
Belk, K. E., J.A. Scanga, J. D. Tatum, J W Wise, & Gary C. Smith. (1998). Simulated instrument augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses.. Journal of Animal Science. 76(2). 522–522. 19 indexed citations
14.
Hilton, G. G., J. D. Tatum, Scott Williams, et al.. (1998). An evaluation of current and alternative systems for quality grading carcasses of mature slaughter cows.. Journal of Animal Science. 76(8). 2094–2094. 44 indexed citations
15.
Field, R. A., R. J. McCormick, V. Balasubramanian, et al.. (1997). Tenderness variation among loin steaks from A and C maturity carcasses of heifers similar in chronological age.. Journal of Animal Science. 75(3). 693–693. 22 indexed citations
16.
Tatum, J. D., H. G. Dolezal, James P. Morgan, et al.. (1997). Comparison of USDA quality grade with tendertec for the assessment of beef palatability.. Journal of Animal Science. 75(6). 1538–1538. 12 indexed citations
17.
Field, R. A., R. J. McCormick, V. Balasubramanian, et al.. (1996). Growth, carcass, and tenderness characteristics of virgin, spayed, and single-calf heifers.. Journal of Animal Science. 74(9). 2178–2178. 21 indexed citations
18.
May, S. G., W. L. Mies, John W. Edwards, et al.. (1992). Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 70(11). 3311–3316. 12 indexed citations
19.
May, S. G., W. L. Mies, John W. Edwards, et al.. (1992). Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness. Journal of Animal Science. 70(8). 2431–2445. 23 indexed citations
20.
Apple, J. K., Michael E. Dikeman, L. V. Cundiff, & J W Wise. (1991). Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem. Journal of Animal Science. 69(12). 4845–4857. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026