J. G. Correia
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 2%
- Topics
- ZnO doping and properties (33 papers)Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (29 papers)Semiconductor materials and interfaces (29 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPhysical Review LettersSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- PortugalSwitzerlandBelgium
In The Last Decade
J. G. Correia
175 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 789
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 692
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 570
- Condensed Matter Physics 567
Countries citing papers authored by J. G. Correia
This map shows the geographic impact of J. G. Correia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. G. Correia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. G. Correia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. G. Correia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. G. Correia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. G. Correia. The network helps show where J. G. Correia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. G. Correia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. G. Correia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. G. Correia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. G. Correia. J. G. Correia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 80 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About J. G. Correia
J. G. Correia is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Radiation and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 178 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ZnO doping and properties (33 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (29 papers) and Semiconductor materials and interfaces (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (567 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (692 citations) and Radiation (259 citations). J. G. Correia has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include U. Wahl, A. Vantomme, João P. Araújo, E. Alves, J.C. Soares, E. Rita, A. M. L. Lopes, Stefan Decoster, J.G. Marques and V. S. Amaral. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.