İnjeong Jo

654 total citations
27 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

İnjeong Jo is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, İnjeong Jo has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in İnjeong Jo's work include Geography Education and Pedagogy (23 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers) and Geography and Education Methods (6 papers). İnjeong Jo is often cited by papers focused on Geography Education and Pedagogy (23 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers) and Geography and Education Methods (6 papers). İnjeong Jo collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. İnjeong Jo's co-authors include Sarah Witham Bednarz, Jinhee Lee, Andrew J. Milson, Samantha Krause, Mijung Kim, Yanan Li, Kenneth H. Keller and Judi Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Journal of Geography and International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education.

In The Last Decade

İnjeong Jo

26 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
İnjeong Jo United States	10	312	140	139	121	25	27	388
Niem Tu Huynh United States	11	242 0.8×	125 0.9×	85 0.6×	77 0.6×	18 0.7×	19	337
Thomas R. Baker United States	5	371 1.2×	92 0.7×	76 0.5×	133 1.1×	36 1.4×	6	419
Richard H. Audet United States	8	186 0.6×	38 0.3×	93 0.7×	63 0.5×	14 0.6×	13	280
Steven Moore United States	6	105 0.3×	34 0.2×	36 0.3×	41 0.3×	28 1.1×	12	170
Rod Lane Australia	10	127 0.4×	13 0.1×	225 1.6×	102 0.8×	30 1.2×	30	310
Thomas Jekel Austria	6	123 0.4×	11 0.1×	40 0.3×	93 0.8×	13 0.5×	57	214
Julian R. Park United Kingdom	7	107 0.3×	8 0.1×	133 1.0×	36 0.3×	48 1.9×	10	271
Lindsey Foster United States	6	21 0.1×	59 0.4×	103 0.7×	23 0.2×	33 1.3×	8	182
Fiona Goodchild United States	5	51 0.2×	10 0.1×	183 1.3×	25 0.2×	5 0.2×	8	324
İnga Gryl Germany	6	104 0.3×	3 0.0×	35 0.3×	90 0.7×	10 0.4×	43	183

Countries citing papers authored by İnjeong Jo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of İnjeong Jo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by İnjeong Jo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites İnjeong Jo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by İnjeong Jo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by İnjeong Jo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by İnjeong Jo. The network helps show where İnjeong Jo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of İnjeong Jo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of İnjeong Jo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of İnjeong Jo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with İnjeong Jo. İnjeong Jo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2024). Teachers’ Evolving Knowledge Base for Teaching Sustainable Development in the Geography Classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research. 49(3). 167–186. 1 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2024). Geography Teachers’ Pedagogical Reasoning and Action While Integrating Sustainable Development into APHG Courses. Journal of Geography. 123(4). 97–111.

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2023). Successes and Struggles: Evaluating Geospatial Technologies Integration in Geography Lessons using TPACK. Journal of Geography. 122(5). 126–139. 2 indexed citations

Li, Yanan, et al.. (2022). Teaching a geography field methods course amid the COVID-19 pandemic: reflections and lessons learned. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 47(2). 339–348. 7 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2020). Effect of Learning GIS on Spatial Concept Understanding. Journal of Geography. 119(3). 87–97. 15 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2019). The Potential Contribution of Geography Curriculum to Scientific Literacy. Journal of Geography. 118(5). 185–196. 12 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong. (2018). World Energy Issues: An Inquiry-Based Lesson Using ArcGIS Online. The Geography Teacher. 15(1). 43–46. 3 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong. (2018). Spatial thinking in secondary geography: A summary of research findings and recommendations for future research. Americanae (AECID Library). 99. 200–212. 3 indexed citations

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2018). NASA Astronaut Photography of Earth: A Resource to Facilitate Students’ Learning and Using Geospatial Concepts. UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee). 5(3). 6. 1 indexed citations

10.

Harris, Judi, et al.. (2018). The Knowledge Base for Geography Teaching (GeoKBT): A Preliminary Model. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 20(1). 26–47. 1 indexed citations

11.

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2018). Geography Education, Spatial Thinking, and Geospatial Technologies: Introduction to the Special Issue. UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee). 5(3). 1. 8 indexed citations

12.

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2017). Undergraduate Students’ Use of Online Information in World Geography: Source Types and Selection Criteria. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 1 indexed citations

13.

Lee, Jinhee, et al.. (2017). Geography preservice teachers’ disposition toward teaching spatial thinking through geography: a comparison between China and Korea. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 27(2). 135–148. 14 indexed citations

14.

Lee, Jinhee, et al.. (2016). Designs, Techniques, and Reporting Strategies in Geography Education: A Review of Research Methods.. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 6(3). 216–233. 11 indexed citations

15.

Jo, İnjeong. (2016). Future Teachers' Dispositions toward Teaching with Geospatial Technologies.. 16(3). 310–327. 4 indexed citations

16.

Jo, İnjeong, et al.. (2016). Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 40(3). 442–459. 57 indexed citations

17.

Jo, İnjeong & Sarah Witham Bednarz. (2014). Dispositions Toward Teaching Spatial Thinking Through Geography: Conceptualization and an Exemplar Assessment. Journal of Geography. 113(5). 198–207. 35 indexed citations

18.

Jo, İnjeong & Sarah Witham Bednarz. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching spatial thinking through geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 38(2). 301–313. 36 indexed citations

19.

Jo, İnjeong & Andrew J. Milson. (2013). College Readiness for Geography: Perceptions of High School Teachers and College Faculty. Journal of Geography. 112(5). 193–204. 7 indexed citations

20.

Jo, İnjeong & Sarah Witham Bednarz. (2011). Textbook Questions to Support Spatial Thinking: Differences in Spatiality by Question Location. Journal of Geography. 110(2). 70–80. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact