Inge Boot
Impact in
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Categorization, perception, and language
- Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Action Observation and Synchronization
Papers in
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 4
- Categorization, perception, and language 2
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 3
- Co-authors
- Diane Pecher (7 shared papers)Jochen Peter (4 shared papers)Johanna M. F. van Oosten (4 shared papers)Jasper G. Wijnen (1 shared paper)Saskia van Dantzig (2 shared papers)Steffen R. Giessner (1 shared paper)Thomas W. Schubert (1 shared paper)Kiki Zanolie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) (2 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)The Journal of Sex Research (1 paper)Media Psychology (1 paper)Brain and Cognition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsPortugalJapan
In The Last Decade
Inge Boot
12 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
- Social Psychology 146
- Gender Studies 49
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
- Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Countries citing papers authored by Inge Boot
This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Boot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Boot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Boot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Boot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Boot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Boot. The network helps show where Inge Boot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Inge Boot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 12 | Metaphors in Abstract Thought | 2010 | 1 |
| 13 | 2011 | 0 |
About Inge Boot
Inge Boot is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Gender Studies, having authored 13 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations), Social Psychology (146 citations), Gender Studies (49 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 citations). Inge Boot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Portugal and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Diane Pecher, Jochen Peter, Johanna M. F. van Oosten, Jasper G. Wijnen, Saskia van Dantzig, Steffen R. Giessner, Thomas W. Schubert, Kiki Zanolie, André Planting and Jaap Verweij. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie), Clinical Cancer Research, The Journal of Sex Research, Media Psychology and Brain and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.