Diane Pecher

4.3k total citations
78 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Diane Pecher is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diane Pecher has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 37 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Diane Pecher's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (32 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (24 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (19 papers). Diane Pecher is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (32 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (24 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (19 papers). Diane Pecher collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and New Zealand. Diane Pecher's co-authors include René Zeelenberg, Rolf A. Zwaan, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Saskia van Dantzig, Inge Boot, Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers, Henk G. Schmidt, Gino Camp, Kiki Zanolie and Piotr Winkielman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Diane Pecher

76 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diane Pecher Netherlands 29 1.4k 1.4k 1.3k 906 225 78 2.7k
Markus Conrad Germany 32 1.5k 1.0× 1.9k 1.4× 800 0.6× 1.0k 1.1× 336 1.5× 55 3.1k
Louise Connell United Kingdom 24 1.3k 0.9× 708 0.5× 921 0.7× 492 0.5× 254 1.1× 65 2.0k
Barbara Kaup Germany 24 1.1k 0.7× 973 0.7× 736 0.5× 764 0.8× 224 1.0× 93 1.9k
René Zeelenberg Netherlands 27 904 0.6× 1.4k 1.0× 831 0.6× 652 0.7× 194 0.9× 71 2.1k
Moreno I. Coco United Kingdom 17 569 0.4× 873 0.6× 354 0.3× 752 0.8× 409 1.8× 52 2.0k
David Vinson United Kingdom 29 2.1k 1.5× 2.2k 1.6× 1.2k 0.9× 1.9k 2.1× 508 2.3× 69 4.3k
David J. Therriault United States 20 1.4k 1.0× 1.0k 0.8× 392 0.3× 1.1k 1.2× 318 1.4× 51 2.7k
Debi Roberson United Kingdom 23 1.8k 1.3× 731 0.5× 913 0.7× 267 0.3× 59 0.3× 54 2.5k
Seana Coulson United States 34 2.8k 2.0× 2.5k 1.9× 1.4k 1.0× 1.7k 1.9× 311 1.4× 88 4.8k
Jeanette Altarriba United States 33 1.3k 0.9× 1.9k 1.4× 774 0.6× 1.4k 1.6× 297 1.3× 96 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Pecher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Pecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Pecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Pecher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Pecher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Pecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Pecher. The network helps show where Diane Pecher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Pecher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Pecher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Pecher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Pecher. Diane Pecher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2025). Study-test overlap rather than multisensory integration benefits memory. Memory & Cognition. 54(2). 440–451.
2.
Zeelenberg, René, et al.. (2024). Non-native language comprehenders encode implied shapes of objects in memory. Cortex. 182. 100–111. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2024). Automatic mental simulation in native and non-native speakers. Memory & Cognition. 52(5). 1152–1163. 3 indexed citations
4.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2023). Age categorization and stereotyping at work. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 37(5). 938–953. 1 indexed citations
5.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2019). Alignment effects for pictured objects: Do instructions to “imagine picking up an object” prime actions?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 45(10). 1346–1354. 2 indexed citations
6.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2017). Effects of grasp compatibility on long-term memory for objects. Acta Psychologica. 182. 65–74. 15 indexed citations
7.
Pecher, Diane, Heleen van Mierlo, Rouwen Cañal‐Bruland, & René Zeelenberg. (2015). The burden of secrecy? No effect on hill slant estimation and beanbag throwing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 144(4). e65–e72. 6 indexed citations
8.
Topolinski, Sascha, et al.. (2014). Oral approach–avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106(6). 885–896. 83 indexed citations
9.
Zanolie, Kiki & Diane Pecher. (2014). Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 987–987. 39 indexed citations
10.
Pecher, Diane. (2013). The Perceptual Representation of Mental Categories. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations
11.
Pecher, Diane. (2012). No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(1). 2–13. 44 indexed citations
12.
Oosterwijk, Suzanne, Piotr Winkielman, Diane Pecher, et al.. (2011). Mental states inside out: Switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus. Memory & Cognition. 40(1). 93–100. 12 indexed citations
13.
Tabbers, Huib K., et al.. (2011). The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: A Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(2). 405–412. 17 indexed citations
14.
Zanolie, Kiki, Saskia van Dantzig, Inge Boot, et al.. (2011). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition. 78(1). 50–58. 97 indexed citations
15.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2011). Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click. Frontiers in Psychology. 2. 10–10. 31 indexed citations
16.
Pecher, Diane, et al.. (2009). Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors. Memory & Cognition. 37(5). 541–546. 7 indexed citations
17.
Pecher, Diane, Saskia van Dantzig, & Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein. (2009). Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16(5). 914–919. 31 indexed citations
18.
Dantzig, Saskia van, Diane Pecher, René Zeelenberg, & Lawrence W. Barsalou. (2008). Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing. Cognitive Science. 32(3). 579–590. 119 indexed citations
19.
Pecher, Diane & Rolf A. Zwaan. (2005). Grounding cognition : the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 327 indexed citations
20.
Pecher, Diane, René Zeelenberg, & Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers. (2005). Enemies and Friends in the Neighborhood: Orthographic Similarity Effects in Semantic Categorization.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 31(1). 121–128. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026