Inês Mendes
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Miguel M. GonçalvesAntónio P. RibeiroInês SousaLeslie S. GreenbergLynne AngusMarlene MatosAnita SantosJoana Silva
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (18 papers)Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (12 papers)Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologyPsychotherapy
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Inês Mendes
21 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Clinical Psychology 481
- Social Psychology 240
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 170
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
- Applied Psychology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Inês Mendes
This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Mendes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Mendes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Mendes. The network helps show where Inês Mendes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inês Mendes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inês Mendes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inês Mendes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inês Mendes. Inês Mendes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Inês Mendes
Inês Mendes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (12 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (481 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (170 citations) and Social Psychology (240 citations). Inês Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Miguel M. Gonçalves, António P. Ribeiro, Inês Sousa, Leslie S. Greenberg, Lynne Angus, Marlene Matos, Anita Santos, Joana Silva, Robert A. Neimeyer and William B. Stiles. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.