António P. Ribeiro
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Miguel M. GonçalvesInês MendesInês SousaWilliam B. StilesLeslie S. GreenbergLynne AngusEugénia RibeiroMarlene Matos
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (32 papers)Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (26 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologyPsychotherapy
- Partner nations
- PortugalCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
António P. Ribeiro
42 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Clinical Psychology 839
- Social Psychology 460
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 279
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
- Applied Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by António P. Ribeiro
This map shows the geographic impact of António P. Ribeiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by António P. Ribeiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites António P. Ribeiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by António P. Ribeiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by António P. Ribeiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by António P. Ribeiro. The network helps show where António P. Ribeiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of António P. Ribeiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of António P. Ribeiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of António P. Ribeiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with António P. Ribeiro. António P. Ribeiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | How to Deal with Ambivalence in Psychotherapy: A Conceptual Model for Case Formulation | 8 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About António P. Ribeiro
António P. Ribeiro is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (32 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (26 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (839 citations), Social Psychology (460 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (279 citations). António P. Ribeiro has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miguel M. Gonçalves, Inês Mendes, Inês Sousa, William B. Stiles, Leslie S. Greenberg, Lynne Angus, Eugénia Ribeiro, Marlene Matos, Anita Santos and Adam O. Horvath. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.