Marlene Matos

2.3k citations
100 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Health top 1%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
    • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
    • Child Abuse and Trauma

Papers in

Marlene Matos

92 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Marlene Matos
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health 512
  • Clinical Psychology 824
  • Gender Studies 219
  • Social Psychology 427
  • Sociology and Political Science 644
Replace Agata Debowska with:
Agata Debowska United Kingdom
Matthew T. Huss United States
Stephen W. Cook United States
Stephen M. Gavazzi United States
Peter Lehmann United States
Mhairi Bowe United Kingdom
Nicholas Bala Canada
Nathan R. Todd United States
Devon L. L. Polaschek New Zealand
Mario J. Scalora United States
Marlene Matos relative to Agata Debowska United Kingdom Agata Debowska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Agata Debowska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marlene Matos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene Matos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene Matos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene Matos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene Matos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene Matos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene Matos. The network helps show where Marlene Matos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marlene Matos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marlene Matos Line = papers co-authored together Marlene Matos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008148
2 2011112
3 2008106
4 201993
5 201678
6 201675
7 201665
8 201656
9 201054
10 200742
11 200940
12 201540
13 201835
14 201333
15 201630
16 201028
17 202023
18 202322
19 201919
20 201419

About Marlene Matos

Marlene Matos is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (47 papers), Sex work and related issues (27 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (22 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (21 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (13 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (13 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (512 citations), Clinical Psychology (824 citations), Gender Studies (219 citations), Social Psychology (427 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (644 citations). Marlene Matos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anita Santos, Miguel M. Gonçalves, Mariana Gonçalves, Andréia Machado, Carla Martins, António P. Ribeiro, Denise A. Hines, Brian H. Spitzberg, Inês Mendes and Célia Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Victims & Offenders, Psychotherapy Research, Journal of Family Violence and Behavioral Sciences & the Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact