Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chunking mechanisms in human learning
2001582 citationsFernand Gobet, Peter C. R. Lane et al.Trends in Cognitive Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Iain Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iain Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iain Oliver more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iain Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iain Oliver. The network helps show where Iain Oliver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iain Oliver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iain Oliver.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iain Oliver based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Iain Oliver. Iain Oliver is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Oliver, Iain, et al.. (2013). Towards the 3D Web with Open Simulator. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository). 2. 900–909.4 indexed citations
9.
Oliver, Iain, et al.. (2012). VIRTUAL MACHINES FOR VIRTUAL WORLDS. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository). 108–113.8 indexed citations
10.
Allison, Colin, et al.. (2012). Growing the use of Virtual Worlds in education : an OpenSim perspective. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository).27 indexed citations
11.
Oliver, Iain, Rebecca Sweetman, Alan Miller, et al.. (2012). Living history with Open Virtual Worlds : Reconstructing St Andrews Cathedral as a stage for historic narrative. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository).6 indexed citations
Oliver, Iain, Alan Miller, & Colin Allison. (2010). Virtual worlds, real traffic. St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository). 305–316.20 indexed citations
Gobet, Fernand, Peter C. R. Lane, Stephen J. Croker, et al.. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5(6). 236–243.582 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.