Hwi-Chang Chen
About
In The Last Decade
Hwi-Chang Chen
10 papers receiving 586 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Molecular Biology 471
- Food Science 237
- Animal Science and Zoology 128
- Analytical Chemistry 77
- Immunology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Hwi-Chang Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Hwi-Chang Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hwi-Chang Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hwi-Chang Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hwi-Chang Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hwi-Chang Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hwi-Chang Chen. The network helps show where Hwi-Chang Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hwi-Chang Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hwi-Chang Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hwi-Chang Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hwi-Chang Chen. Hwi-Chang Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 84 | |
| 5 | 124 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 84 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.