How Lee

8 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review 2009 · 821 citations
8212009202620142020250500750

Peers

How Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Research and Theory 469
  • Leadership and Management 59
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 58
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 369
  • General Health Professions 747
Replace Erin Stafford with:
Erin Stafford United States
Donna K. McNeese‐Smith United States
Heather Spence Laschinger Canada
Joan Almost Canada
Majd T. Mrayyan Jordan
Nora E. Warshawsky United States
Yupin Aungsuroch Thailand
Mary T. Quinn Griffin United States
Frances Hughes New Zealand
Nicola North New Zealand
How Lee relative to Erin Stafford United States Erin Stafford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Erin Stafford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by How Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of How Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by How Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by How Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by How Lee. The network helps show where How Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside How Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with How Lee Line = papers co-authored together How Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2009821
2 2008211
3 2008167
4 201034
5 201429
6 200813
7 20063
8 20241

About How Lee

How Lee is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Leadership and Management, Health Information Management, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper) and Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (469 citations), Leadership and Management (59 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (58 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (369 citations) and General Health Professions (747 citations). How Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Greta G. Cummings, Tara MacGregor, Erin Stafford, Carol Wong, Melanie Muise, Daniel A. Scott, Judith A. Spiers, Florence Luhanga, Olive Yonge and Barbara Wilson-Keates. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Nurse Educator and Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026