Herbert G. Hunt

708 total citations
23 papers, 534 citations indexed

About

Herbert G. Hunt is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Herbert G. Hunt has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 534 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Accounting, 6 papers in Strategy and Management and 6 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Herbert G. Hunt's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers). Herbert G. Hunt is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers). Herbert G. Hunt collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Herbert G. Hunt's co-authors include Joanne C. Duke, Raymond L. Hogler, Stephen J. Dempsey, J. Keith Ord, Ken V. Peasnell, Stephan Weiler, Praveen Sinha, Pamela M. Homer, Martien Lubberink and Shannon Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research and Accounting Organizations and Society.

In The Last Decade

Herbert G. Hunt

22 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Herbert G. Hunt United States	10	455	299	88	84	52	23	534
Jonas Oliveira Portugal	11	590 1.3×	322 1.1×	97 1.1×	44 0.5×	66 1.3×	35	687
Pascal Dumontier France	12	658 1.4×	422 1.4×	139 1.6×	112 1.3×	98 1.9×	28	791
Denise A. Jones United States	7	407 0.9×	284 0.9×	139 1.6×	129 1.5×	84 1.6×	11	555
Stuart Manson United Kingdom	13	489 1.1×	275 0.9×	76 0.9×	101 1.2×	43 0.8×	25	583
Sean W. G. Robb United States	11	564 1.2×	371 1.2×	195 2.2×	64 0.8×	51 1.0×	21	684
Margaret B. Shackell United States	7	357 0.8×	164 0.5×	73 0.8×	78 0.9×	99 1.9×	11	479
Kimberly Dunn United States	11	728 1.6×	318 1.1×	172 2.0×	82 1.0×	73 1.4×	22	795
Bita Mashayekhi Iran	9	533 1.2×	256 0.9×	85 1.0×	51 0.6×	64 1.2×	33	618
Brian Tayan United States	11	404 0.9×	187 0.6×	104 1.2×	32 0.4×	82 1.6×	72	514
Niclas Hellman Sweden	13	416 0.9×	239 0.8×	80 0.9×	100 1.2×	42 0.8×	31	489

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert G. Hunt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert G. Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert G. Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert G. Hunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert G. Hunt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert G. Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert G. Hunt. The network helps show where Herbert G. Hunt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert G. Hunt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert G. Hunt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert G. Hunt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert G. Hunt. Herbert G. Hunt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Homer, Pamela M., et al.. (2020). Faculty Salary Inversion, Compression, and Market Salary Gap in California State University Business Schools. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 33(2). 99–122. 2 indexed citations

Hogler, Raymond L., Herbert G. Hunt, & Stephan Weiler. (2014). Killing Unions with Culture: Institutions, Inequality, and the Effects of Labor’s Decline in the United States. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 27(1). 63–79. 9 indexed citations

Sinha, Praveen & Herbert G. Hunt. (2013). Auditor Independence: A Nonparametric Test of Differences Across the Big-5 Public Accounting Firms. Accounting Perspectives. 12(4). 301–320. 2 indexed citations

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (2012). Additional Evidence on Analysts’ Decision to Issue Disaggregated Earnings Forecasts: Strategic Biasing. Abacus. 48(2). 249–277. 3 indexed citations

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (2004). The Potential Link Between Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2002). Firm-Specific Determinants of Off-Balance Sheet Leasing: A Test of the Smith/Wakeman Model. Journal of business and management.. 8(4). 335–353. 10 indexed citations

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (2002). Gifted pollution allowances: recognizing a liability to society. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 13(2). 211–228. 12 indexed citations

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (2001). Commentary on: Some thoughts on social and environmental accounting education. Accounting Education. 10(4). 365–368. 5 indexed citations

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (2000). Development of an Integrated Course in Accounting: A Focus on Environmental Issues. Issues in Accounting Education. 15(1). 19–42. 36 indexed citations

10.

Hunt, Herbert G., et al.. (1999). How will fast-approaching global accounting standards affect U.S. firms?. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 10(3). 73–80. 1 indexed citations

11.

Hogler, Raymond L., et al.. (1996). Accounting standards, health care, and retired American workers: An institutional critique. Accounting Organizations and Society. 21(5). 423–439. 6 indexed citations

12.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (1995). AN EXAMINATION OF DEBT‐EQUITY PROXIES VS. ACTUAL DEBT COVENANT RESTRICTIONS IN ACCOUNTING CHOICE STUDIES. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 22(5). 615–635. 5 indexed citations

13.

Hunt, Herbert G. & Raymond L. Hogler. (1993). An institutional analysis of accounting growth and regulation in the United States. Accounting Organizations and Society. 18(4). 341–360. 11 indexed citations

14.

Dempsey, Stephen J., et al.. (1993). EARNINGS MANAGEMENT AND CORPORATE OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE: AN EXAMINATION OF EXTRAORDINARY ITEM REPORTING. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 20(4). 479–500. 60 indexed citations

15.

Hogler, Raymond L. & Herbert G. Hunt. (1993). Accounting and Conceptions of Control in the American Corporation¹. British Journal of Management. 4(3). 177–190. 8 indexed citations

16.

Hunt, Herbert G. & Raymond L. Hogler. (1990). Agency theory as ideology: A comparative analysis based on critical legal theory and radical accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society. 15(5). 437–454. 27 indexed citations

17.

Duke, Joanne C. & Herbert G. Hunt. (1990). An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 12(1-3). 45–63. 231 indexed citations

18.

Hunt, Herbert G. & Raymond L. Hogler. (1990). Corporate ownership and accounting choice: A critical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 1(1). 53–67. 10 indexed citations

19.

Hunt, Herbert G.. (1985). Potential Determinants of Corporate Inventory Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting Research. 23(2). 448–448. 72 indexed citations

20.

Hunt, Herbert G.. (1984). Planning for employee health and safety. Business Horizons. 27(5). 24–29. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact