Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Board Monitoring and Earnings Management: Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals?
2005851 citationsKen V. Peasnell, Peter F. Pope et al.Journal of Business Finance & Accountingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ken V. Peasnell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ken V. Peasnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken V. Peasnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken V. Peasnell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken V. Peasnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken V. Peasnell. The network helps show where Ken V. Peasnell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken V. Peasnell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken V. Peasnell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken V. Peasnell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ken V. Peasnell. Ken V. Peasnell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hsu, Audrey Wen-hsin, John F. O’Hanlon, & Ken V. Peasnell. (2011). The Basu Measure as an Indicator of Conditional Conservatism: Evidence from U.K. Earnings Components. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).7 indexed citations
Peasnell, Ken V., Peter F. Pope, & Steve Young. (1999). Outside Directors, Board Effectiveness, and Abnormal Accruals. SSRN Electronic Journal.17 indexed citations
7.
Peasnell, Ken V., Peter F. Pope, & Steve Young. (1999). Directors: who are they?. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).7 indexed citations
8.
Peasnell, Ken V., et al.. (1998). Managerial Ownership and the Demand for Outside Directors.8 indexed citations
9.
Peasnell, Ken V., et al.. (1998). Fixed Asset Revaluation and Equity Depletion in the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
10.
O’Hanlon, John F. & Ken V. Peasnell. (1998). Wall Street's Contribution to Management Accounting: The Stern Stewart EVA Financial Management System. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
11.
Piesse, Jenifer, Ken V. Peasnell, & C.W.R. Ward. (1995). British financial markets and institutions : an international perspective. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).3 indexed citations
Peasnell, Ken V. & Len Skerratt. (1976). Current cost accounting, the index number problem. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).6 indexed citations
Peasnell, Ken V.. (1974). Accounting objectives : a critique of the Trueblood report. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).2 indexed citations
20.
Peasnell, Ken V.. (1973). The usefulness of accounting information to investors. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.