Margaret B. Shackell
- Accounting top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Glen DowellLi Li EngMarilyn F. JohnsonSally K. WidenerElizabeth DemersSusan L. PorterMarc J. BuehnerSandra C. Vera‐Muñoz
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers)
- Journals
- Strategic Management JournalContemporary Accounting ResearchJournal of Accounting Auditing & Finance
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Margaret B. Shackell
11 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Accounting 357
- Strategy and Management 164
- Economics and Econometrics 99
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 82
- Management Information Systems 78
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret B. Shackell
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret B. Shackell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret B. Shackell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret B. Shackell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret B. Shackell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret B. Shackell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret B. Shackell. The network helps show where Margaret B. Shackell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret B. Shackell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret B. Shackell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret B. Shackell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret B. Shackell. Margaret B. Shackell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 168 | |
| 2 | Boards, CEOS, and Surviving a Financial Crisis: Evidence from the Internet Shakeout | 3 |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | An Empirical Analysis of the SEC's 1992 Proxy Reforms on Executive Compensation | 2 |
| 8 | 92 | |
| 9 | The Implications of Long-term Performance Plans and Institutional Ownership for Firms' R&D Investments | 1 |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 46 |
About Margaret B. Shackell
Margaret B. Shackell is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (357 citations), Strategy and Management (164 citations) and Management Information Systems (78 citations). Margaret B. Shackell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Glen Dowell, Li Li Eng, Marilyn F. Johnson, Sally K. Widener, Elizabeth Demers, Susan L. Porter, Marc J. Buehner, Sandra C. Vera‐Muñoz and Karen K. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Contemporary Accounting Research and Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.