Joanne C. Duke

474 total citations
11 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Joanne C. Duke is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Joanne C. Duke has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Accounting, 5 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Joanne C. Duke's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers). Joanne C. Duke is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers). Joanne C. Duke collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Joanne C. Duke's co-authors include Herbert G. Hunt, Peter R. Tait, Jane Monnig Atkinson, Patricia Easteal and James Grantham Turner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting and Journal of Education for Business.

In The Last Decade

Joanne C. Duke

10 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joanne C. Duke United States	6	322	224	56	38	25	11	359
Antti Miihkinen Finland	10	296 0.9×	150 0.7×	56 1.0×	37 1.0×	30 1.2×	18	348
Neil Garrod United Kingdom	10	284 0.9×	173 0.8×	57 1.0×	36 0.9×	27 1.1×	30	331
Peter H. Eddey Australia	9	318 1.0×	219 1.0×	76 1.4×	45 1.2×	25 1.0×	14	350
Fernando Caio Galdi Brazil	10	231 0.7×	162 0.7×	38 0.7×	36 0.9×	12 0.5×	61	300
Nieves Gómez Aguilar Spain	10	458 1.4×	133 0.6×	48 0.9×	17 0.4×	39 1.6×	27	495
J‐L.W. Mitchell Van der Zahn Australia	9	431 1.3×	318 1.4×	33 0.6×	16 0.4×	20 0.8×	11	515
José Elias Feres de Almeida Brazil	10	217 0.7×	135 0.6×	27 0.5×	26 0.7×	10 0.4×	50	258
Gail E. Farrelly United States	8	365 1.1×	168 0.8×	113 2.0×	85 2.2×	9 0.4×	16	421
Michael Stich Germany	7	208 0.6×	157 0.7×	74 1.3×	31 0.8×	23 0.9×	10	294
Gary M. Entwistle Canada	10	364 1.1×	261 1.2×	91 1.6×	31 0.8×	28 1.1×	27	406

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne C. Duke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne C. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne C. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne C. Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne C. Duke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne C. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne C. Duke. The network helps show where Joanne C. Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne C. Duke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne C. Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne C. Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne C. Duke. Joanne C. Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2014). Improving the Disclosure Basis of Pension Accounting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 25(4). 63–70.

2.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2012). Evaluating Constructive Lease Capitalization and Off‐Balance‐Sheet Financing: An Instructional Case with FedEx and UPS. Accounting Perspectives. 11(1). 57–69. 4 indexed citations

3.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2011). A Loophole In Financial Accounting: A Detailed Analysis Of Repo 105. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR). 27(5). 33–33. 3 indexed citations

4.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2009). Operating and synthetic leases: Exploiting financial benefits in the post-Enron era. Advances in Accounting. 25(1). 28–39. 61 indexed citations

5.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2006). Capturing the benefits of operating and synthetic leases. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 18(1). 45–52. 14 indexed citations

6.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (2002). Firm-Specific Determinants of Off-Balance Sheet Leasing: A Test of the Smith/Wakeman Model. Journal of business and management.. 8(4). 335–353. 10 indexed citations

7.

Easteal, Patricia, et al.. (2000). The Impact of Domestic Violence on Individuals. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

8.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (1995). AN EXAMINATION OF DEBT‐EQUITY PROXIES VS. ACTUAL DEBT COVENANT RESTRICTIONS IN ACCOUNTING CHOICE STUDIES. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 22(5). 615–635. 5 indexed citations

9.

Duke, Joanne C., et al.. (1992). Predicting Student Performance in Accounting Classes. Journal of Education for Business. 67(5). 270–274. 28 indexed citations

10.

Duke, Joanne C. & Herbert G. Hunt. (1990). An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 12(1-3). 45–63. 231 indexed citations

11.

Duke, Joanne C.. (1987). Debt covenant restrictions and accounting technique choice : an empirical study. UMI Dissertation Information Service eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact