Henry Rosemont
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Co-authors
- Roger T. AmesDaniel CookGottfried Wilhelm LeibnizA. C. GrahamDavid N. KeightleyMichael LoeweZelda F. GamsonWalter Feinberg
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (18 papers)Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (2 papers)Religious Education and Schools (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Henry Rosemont
34 papers receiving 508 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 461
- Social Psychology 139
- Cultural Studies 133
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- Philosophy 112
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Rosemont
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Rosemont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Rosemont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Rosemont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Rosemont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Rosemont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Rosemont. The network helps show where Henry Rosemont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henry Rosemont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henry Rosemont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henry Rosemont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henry Rosemont. Henry Rosemont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Translating and Interpreting Chinese Philosophy | 3 |
| 2 | 80 | |
| 3 | Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Writings on China | 6 |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Studies in Classical Chinese Thought | 0 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Henry Rosemont
Henry Rosemont is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 40 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (18 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (2 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (133 citations), Religious studies (74 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (461 citations). Henry Rosemont has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger T. Ames, Daniel Cook, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, A. C. Graham, David N. Keightley, Michael Loewe, Zelda F. Gamson, Walter Feinberg, Steven I. Levine and Jiwei Ci. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Modern Language Journal and The China Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.