Benjamin I. Schwartz
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Gilbert RozmanLisa RaphalsJohn Κ. FairbankFrederick W. MoteSteven S. GrossHarold R. IsaacsMary Jeanne KreekJoanna Giza
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (20 papers)Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper)Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Cultural StudiesSociology and Political SciencePolitical Science and International Relations
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Benjamin I. Schwartz
32 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 495
- Political Science and International Relations 205
- Cultural Studies 117
- Philosophy 55
- Economics and Econometrics 54
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin I. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin I. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin I. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin I. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin I. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin I. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin I. Schwartz. The network helps show where Benjamin I. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin I. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin I. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin I. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin I. Schwartz. Benjamin I. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | Historical and comparative perspectives | 2 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Studies in Classical Chinese Thought | 0 |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | The Rousseau Strain in the Contemporary World. | 1 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Benjamin I. Schwartz
Benjamin I. Schwartz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (20 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (1 paper) and Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (117 citations), Sociology and Political Science (495 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (205 citations). Benjamin I. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert Rozman, Lisa Raphals, John Κ. Fairbank, Frederick W. Mote, Steven S. Gross, Harold R. Isaacs, Mary Jeanne Kreek, Joanna Giza, Yan Zhou and Francis S. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Psychopharmacology and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.