Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective
2020252 citationsIris Vermeir, Maggie Geuens et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Hendrik Slabbinck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hendrik Slabbinck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hendrik Slabbinck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hendrik Slabbinck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hendrik Slabbinck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hendrik Slabbinck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hendrik Slabbinck. The network helps show where Hendrik Slabbinck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hendrik Slabbinck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hendrik Slabbinck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hendrik Slabbinck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hendrik Slabbinck. Hendrik Slabbinck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Slabbinck, Hendrik, et al.. (2020). GIF it to me : the effect of animation on sense of urgency and impulse buying. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Vermeir, Iris, et al.. (2018). Approach and Loss Aversion: Consumer Responses to Approaching and Receding Stimuli in Advertising. Advances in consumer research. 46.1 indexed citations
14.
Vermeir, Iris, et al.. (2018). Paper box or plastic bag? Structural package design elements affect health perception and consumption. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
15.
Roodhooft, Filip, et al.. (2016). Management Control System Imitation in Supply Chains. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
16.
Slabbinck, Hendrik & Patrick Van Kenhove. (2010). Social Desirability and Indirect Questioning: New Insights From the Implicit Association Test and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Advances in consumer research. 37. 904.1 indexed citations
17.
Slabbinck, Hendrik & Patrick Van Kenhove. (2009). The IAT is not enough: the added value of projective techniques in consumer research. Advances in consumer research. 36. 923–925.1 indexed citations
18.
Slabbinck, Hendrik & Irene Roozen. (2008). The Relationship between Brand- and Media Personality Characteristics. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
19.
Slabbinck, Hendrik, et al.. (1999). Realisation of SuperPON demonstrator.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
20.
Qiu, Xing-Zhi, Jan Vandewege, Ilse Van De Voorde, et al.. (1998). Final results of the PLANET lab demonstrator. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 49–52.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.