Helena M. Mentis
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Pushmeet KohliSebastian NowozinKenton O’HaraAbigail SellenMary Beth RossonAisling Ann O’KaneJohn M. CarrollGregorio Convertino
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (19 papers)Augmented Reality Applications (14 papers)Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Helena M. Mentis
92 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Human-Computer Interaction 811
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 528
- Surgery 254
- Biomedical Engineering 223
- Social Psychology 200
Countries citing papers authored by Helena M. Mentis
This map shows the geographic impact of Helena M. Mentis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helena M. Mentis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helena M. Mentis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helena M. Mentis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helena M. Mentis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helena M. Mentis. The network helps show where Helena M. Mentis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helena M. Mentis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helena M. Mentis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helena M. Mentis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helena M. Mentis. Helena M. Mentis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | Improving Common Ground Development in Surgical Training through Talk and Action. | 1 |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | Serious work on playful experiences : a preliminary set of challenges | 5 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Comparing media in emergency planning | 7 |
| 19 | Prototyping collaborative geospatial emergency planning | 14 |
| 20 | Vitamin E and benign breast disease. | 27 |
About Helena M. Mentis
Helena M. Mentis is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Demography and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (19 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (14 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (811 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (528 citations) and Applied Psychology (92 citations). Helena M. Mentis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pushmeet Kohli, Sebastian Nowozin, Kenton O’Hara, Abigail Sellen, Mary Beth Rosson, Aisling Ann O’Kane, John M. Carroll, Gregorio Convertino, Richard Harper and Aleksandra Slavković. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Gait & Posture and Surgical Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.