Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling—perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences
2019405 citationsMark Alber, Adrián Buganza Tepole et al.npj Digital Medicineprofile →
Mechanical properties of the hexagonal boron nitride monolayer: Ab initio study
2012378 citationsQing Peng, Wei Ji et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Suvranu De's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suvranu De with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suvranu De more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suvranu De. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suvranu De. The network helps show where Suvranu De may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Suvranu De
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Suvranu De.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Suvranu De based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Suvranu De. Suvranu De is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alber, Mark, Adrián Buganza Tepole, William R. Cannon, et al.. (2019). Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling—perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences. npj Digital Medicine. 2(1). 115–115.405 indexed citations breakdown →
Peng, Qing, Chao Liang, Wei Ji, & Suvranu De. (2013). A Theoretical Analysis of the Effect of the Hydrogenation of Graphene to Graphane on Its Mechanical Properties. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013.
Prajapati, PK, et al.. (2007). A comparative Pharmaceutico - Pharmaco - Clinical Study of Lauha Bhasma and Mandura Bhasma w. s. r. to its Panduhara Effect. 28(1). 11.6 indexed citations
17.
Weidemann, Frank, Faizi Jamal, Tomasz Kukulski, et al.. (2001). Can ultrasonic strain rate imaging quantify the changes in systolic function during dobutamine infusion, b-blockade and atrial pacing? an experimental study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 37.1 indexed citations
18.
Claus, Piet, Bart Bijnens, Frank Weidemann, et al.. (2001). Underlying mechanism of post-systolic thickening is this active contraction or a passive event? a one-dimensional mathematical model. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2.1 indexed citations
19.
De, Suvranu, et al.. (1999). Impact of surface electrochemical polishing on stent performance: insights from a porcine coronary model. European Heart Journal. 20. 273–273.1 indexed citations
20.
De, Suvranu, et al.. (1978). Sero-epidemiological evidence of Coxiella burnetii infection among selected human population in Calcutta.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 68. 911–6.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.