Aisling Ann O’Kane
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Ann BlandfordHelena M. MentisYvonne RogersAmid AyobiKatarzyna StawarzPaul MarshallGerrit NiezenYunan Chen
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (19 papers)Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (14 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesFrontiers in Public HealthJMIR mhealth and uhealth
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Aisling Ann O’Kane
44 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Human-Computer Interaction 264
- General Health Professions 175
- Demography 119
- Applied Psychology 113
- Sociology and Political Science 87
Countries citing papers authored by Aisling Ann O’Kane
This map shows the geographic impact of Aisling Ann O’Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aisling Ann O’Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aisling Ann O’Kane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aisling Ann O’Kane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aisling Ann O’Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aisling Ann O’Kane. The network helps show where Aisling Ann O’Kane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aisling Ann O’Kane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aisling Ann O’Kane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aisling Ann O’Kane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aisling Ann O’Kane. Aisling Ann O’Kane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | Machine Learning Explanations as Boundary Objects: How AI Researchers Explain and Non-Experts Perceive Machine Learning | 2 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Aisling Ann O’Kane
Aisling Ann O’Kane is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology and Health Informatics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (19 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (264 citations), Applied Psychology (113 citations) and Health Informatics (25 citations). Aisling Ann O’Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ann Blandford, Helena M. Mentis, Yvonne Rogers, Amid Ayobi, Katarzyna Stawarz, Paul Marshall, Gerrit Niezen, Yunan Chen, Dominic Furniss and Eno Thereska. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Frontiers in Public Health and JMIR mhealth and uhealth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.