Harriet Speed
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- John RossMichael J. MorganRobert C. FullerCheyne A. ShermanMark B. AndersenJane CrossmanJohn VincentLouise Brearley Messer
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers)Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers)Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Harriet Speed
13 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Social Psychology 63
- Gender Studies 54
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
- Sociology and Political Science 45
Countries citing papers authored by Harriet Speed
This map shows the geographic impact of Harriet Speed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harriet Speed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harriet Speed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harriet Speed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harriet Speed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harriet Speed. The network helps show where Harriet Speed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harriet Speed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harriet Speed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harriet Speed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harriet Speed. Harriet Speed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | The health and welfare of thoroughbred horse trainers and stable employees | 6 |
| 5 | The welfare of retired jockeys | 11 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | Gender comparisons of preferred coaching behaviors in Australian sports. | 52 |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 8 |
About Harriet Speed
Harriet Speed is a scholar working on Equine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (32 citations). Harriet Speed has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Ross, Michael J. Morgan, Robert C. Fuller, Cheyne A. Sherman, Mark B. Andersen, Jane Crossman, John Vincent, Louise Brearley Messer, David C. Burr and Maria Concetta Morrone. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of science and medicine in sport and Dental Traumatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.