Steffi Pohl

47 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers

Steffi Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Statistics and Probability 290
  • Management Science and Operations Research 393
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 225
  • Applied Psychology 82
  • Computer Science Applications 60
Replace Claus H. Carstensen with:
Claus H. Carstensen Germany
Marie Wiberg Sweden
Jorge N. Tendeiro Netherlands
Sun‐Joo Cho United States
Insu Paek United States
Tao Xin China
Barbara G. Dodd United States
Steffen Zitzmann Germany
R. J. De Ayala United States
Yanyan Sheng United States
Steffi Pohl relative to Claus H. Carstensen Germany Claus H. Carstensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Claus H. Carstensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffi Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffi Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffi Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffi Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffi Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffi Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffi Pohl. The network helps show where Steffi Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffi Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffi Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Steffi Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201387
2 201967
3 200963
4 201062
5 200759
6 201346
7 202145
8 200943
9 201938
10 201234
11 200931
12 202130
13 201430
14 201928
15 202128
16 201922
17 201721
18 202119
19 201117
20 202117

About Steffi Pohl

Steffi Pohl is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 53 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (23 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (15 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (14 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (290 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (393 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (225 citations), Applied Psychology (82 citations) and Computer Science Applications (60 citations). Steffi Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Esther Ulitzsch, Matthias von Davier, Claus H. Carstensen, Rolf Steyer, Peter M. Steiner, Norman Rose, Thomas D. Cook, Carmen Köhler, Stéphane Vautier and Tenko Raykov. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Psychometrika, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Journal of Educational Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact