Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants
Countries citing papers authored by Grégory Jackson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Grégory Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grégory Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grégory Jackson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grégory Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grégory Jackson. The network helps show where Grégory Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grégory Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grégory Jackson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grégory Jackson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Grégory Jackson. Grégory Jackson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Witt, Michael A. & Grégory Jackson. (2016). Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Comparative Advantage: A Test and Reinterpretation. SSRN Electronic Journal.
3.
Jackson, Grégory & Stephen Brammer. (2014). Introducing grey areas: the unexpectedly weak link between corporate irresponsibility and reputation. Socio-Economic Review. 12(1). 154–166.11 indexed citations
4.
Sako, Mari & Grégory Jackson. (2009). Strategy Meets Institutions: The Transformation of Management-Labor Relations at Deutsche Telekom and NTT. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).
5.
Strange, Roger & Grégory Jackson. (2008). Corporate Governance and International Business. Strategy, Performance and Institutional Change. Figshare.11 indexed citations
6.
Jackson, Grégory & Richard Deeg. (2008). From Comparing Capitalisms to the Politics of Institutional Change. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Jackson, Grégory, et al.. (2007). Key Drivers of ‘Good’ Corporate Governance and the Appropriateness of Policy Responses in the UK. Report to the Department of Trade and Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal.27 indexed citations
Jackson, Grégory. (2005). Employee Representation in the Board Compared: A Fuzzy Sets Analysis of Corporate Governance, Unionism, and Political Institutions. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 23(3). 252–279.30 indexed citations
Jackson, Grégory & Sigurt Vitols. (2001). Between Financial Commitment, Market Liquidity and Corporate Governance: Occupational Pensions in Britain, Germany, Japan and the USA. Max Planck Digital Library. 171–189.25 indexed citations
15.
Jackson, Grégory. (1994). Promoting Civility on the Academic Network: Crime & Punishment, or the Golden Rule?. Educational record. 75(3). 29–39.1 indexed citations
Jackson, Grégory. (1977). Description of Merged Data Base: Appendix F. The Development of Institutions of Higher Education. Theory and Assessment of Impact of Four Possible Areas of Federal Intervention..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.