Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Workload, work intensification and time poverty for teachers and school leaders: a systematic research synthesis
202381 citationsSue Creagh, Greg Thompson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Thompson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Thompson. The network helps show where Greg Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg Thompson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg Thompson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Greg Thompson. Greg Thompson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lingard, Bob & Greg Thompson. (2017). Doing time in the sociology of education. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).80 indexed citations
8.
Lingard, Bob, Sam Sellar, Anna Hogan, & Greg Thompson. (2017). Commercialisation in Public Schooling (CIPS). Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).17 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, Greg. (2017). Coding Comes of Age: Coding Is Gradually Making Its Way from Club to Curriculum, Thanks Largely to the Nationwide Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Phenomenon Embraced by So Many American Schools. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 44(1). 28.1 indexed citations
10.
Thompson, Greg. (2014). The Maker Movement Connects to the Classroom: A Hands-On Approach to STEM Engages Students, but How Does Project-Based Learning Connect with Standardized Testing?. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 41(4). 9.1 indexed citations
11.
Thompson, Greg. (2014). 4 Keys to Designing the Classroom of the Future. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 41(9). 18.1 indexed citations
Thompson, Greg. (2010). 'White Man's Dreaming' - the Northern Territory Emergency Response: 'The Intervention'. 86.1 indexed citations
14.
Thompson, Greg, et al.. (2008). Does the Public Really Know What We Do in Agricultural Education. The Agricultural education magazine. 81(2). 20.1 indexed citations
15.
Beaudrie, Sara M., et al.. (2004). MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHER EVALUATION IN THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM. 11. 57–80.4 indexed citations
16.
Thompson, Greg, et al.. (2004). Putting the Science of Agriculture into Instruction: The Why and How. The Agricultural education magazine. 76(5). 13.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.