F. Turco

2.1k total citations
83 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

F. Turco is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Turco has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 78 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 39 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 30 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in F. Turco's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (78 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (39 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (28 papers). F. Turco is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (78 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (39 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (28 papers). F. Turco collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and China. F. Turco's co-authors include T. C. Luce, J.M. Hanson, T. C. Luce, C. C. Petty, W.M. Solomon, C. T. Holcomb, R.J. La Haye, J. R. Ferron, David Humphreys and M.J. Lanctot and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

F. Turco

78 papers receiving 967 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Turco United States 21 981 383 363 351 310 83 1.0k
S. P. Smith United States 20 1.1k 1.1× 404 1.1× 519 1.4× 255 0.7× 314 1.0× 67 1.1k
A.S. Welander United States 18 1.1k 1.1× 350 0.9× 316 0.9× 482 1.4× 436 1.4× 76 1.1k
Y. Gribov France 19 1.2k 1.2× 500 1.3× 362 1.0× 656 1.9× 466 1.5× 57 1.3k
ASDEX Upgrade Team Germany 18 942 1.0× 420 1.1× 395 1.1× 223 0.6× 294 0.9× 39 1.1k
R.R. Khayrutdinov Russia 17 1.3k 1.3× 671 1.8× 276 0.8× 677 1.9× 378 1.2× 111 1.4k
Y.M. Jeon South Korea 16 995 1.0× 311 0.8× 558 1.5× 304 0.9× 267 0.9× 79 1.1k
S.H. Hahn South Korea 15 699 0.7× 239 0.6× 243 0.7× 276 0.8× 248 0.8× 93 761
V.E. Lukash Russia 18 1.3k 1.3× 694 1.8× 317 0.9× 676 1.9× 346 1.1× 85 1.4k
contributors to the EFDA-JET Workprogramme United Kingdom 25 1.4k 1.4× 655 1.7× 606 1.7× 426 1.2× 295 1.0× 48 1.5k
Biao Shen China 19 723 0.7× 207 0.5× 306 0.8× 260 0.7× 226 0.7× 97 900

Countries citing papers authored by F. Turco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Turco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Turco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Turco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Turco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Turco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Turco. The network helps show where F. Turco may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Turco

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Turco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Turco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Turco. F. Turco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yang, J., N.C. Logan, J.W. Berkery, et al.. (2025). Technology readiness assessment of magnetohydrodynamic stability control. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 67(9). 95015–95015.
2.
Sips, A. C. C., F. Turco, C. M. Greenfield, et al.. (2024). Power and isotope effects in the ITER baseline scenario with tungsten and tungsten-equivalent radiators in DIII-D. Nuclear Fusion. 64(7). 76037–76037. 1 indexed citations
3.
Turco, F., T.C. Luce, T. H. Osborne, et al.. (2024). Radiation induced non-linear oscillations in ITER baseline scenario plasmas in DIII-D. Nuclear Fusion. 64(8). 86008–86008. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hanson, J.M., et al.. (2023). Simultaneous stabilization and control of the n = 1 and n = 2 resistive wall mode. Nuclear Fusion. 63(6). 66025–66025. 4 indexed citations
5.
Turco, F., J.M. Hanson, A. Marinoni, et al.. (2023). MHD stability of negative triangularity DIII-D plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 63(8). 86007–86007. 9 indexed citations
6.
Thome, K. E., Xiaodi Du, B. A. Grierson, et al.. (2021). Response of thermal and fast-ion transport to beam ion population, rotation and T e/T i in the DIII-D steady state hybrid scenario. Nuclear Fusion. 61(3). 36036–36036. 4 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Huiqian, Huan Guo, Guosheng Xu, et al.. (2020). First Evidence of Local E×B Drift in the Divertor Influencing the Structure and Stability of Confined Plasma near the Edge of Fusion Devices. Physical Review Letters. 124(19). 195002–195002. 17 indexed citations
8.
Luce, T. C. & F. Turco. (2018). The new stable ITER Baseline Scenario with zero torque. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 1 indexed citations
9.
Nazikian, R., C. C. Petty, A. Bortolon, et al.. (2018). Grassy-ELM regime with edge resonant magnetic perturbations in fully noninductive plasmas in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 58(10). 106010–106010. 33 indexed citations
10.
Luce, T. C. & F. Turco. (2017). Exploring an Alternate Approach to Q =10 in ITER. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017. 1 indexed citations
11.
Yoshida, M., G. R. McKee, M. Murakami, et al.. (2017). Magnetic shear effects on plasma transport and turbulence at high electron to ion temperature ratio in DIII-D and JT-60U plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 57(5). 56027–56027. 10 indexed citations
12.
Wingen, A., R.S. Wilcox, M. Cianciosa, et al.. (2016). Reconstruction of 3D VMEC equilibria with helical cores in DIII-D. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016. 1 indexed citations
13.
Turnbull, A. D., J.M. Hanson, F. Turco, et al.. (2016). The external kink mode in diverted tokamaks. Journal of Plasma Physics. 82(3). 14 indexed citations
14.
Holcomb, C. T., W. W. Heidbrink, J. R. Ferron, et al.. (2015). Fast-ion transport in qmin>2, high-β steady-state scenarios on DIII-D. Physics of Plasmas. 22(5). 29 indexed citations
15.
Paz-Soldan, C., T. C. Luce, A. M. Garofalo, et al.. (2014). Extending the Physics Basis of ITER Baseline Scenario Stability to Zero Input Torque. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014. 1 indexed citations
16.
King, J. D., M. A. Makowski, C. T. Holcomb, et al.. (2011). Magnetohydrodynamic interference with the edge pedestal motional Stark effect diagnostic on DIII-D. Review of Scientific Instruments. 82(3). 33515–33515. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lennholm, M., L.-G. Eriksson, F. Turco, et al.. (2009). Closed Loop Sawtooth Period Control Using Variable ECCD Injection Angles on Tore Supra. Fusion Science & Technology. 55(1). 45–55. 20 indexed citations
18.
Jackson, G.L., T. A. Casper, T. C. Luce, et al.. (2009). Simulating ITER plasma startup and rampdown scenarios in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 49(11). 115027–115027. 24 indexed citations
19.
Eriksson, L.-G., F. Turco, F. Bouquey, et al.. (2009). Demonstration of Effective Control of Fast-Ion-Stabilized Sawteeth by Electron-Cyclotron Current Drive. Physical Review Letters. 102(11). 115004–115004. 35 indexed citations
20.
Welander, A.S., R.J. LaHaye, B.G. Penaflor, et al.. (2001). Control of Neoclassical Tearing Modes in DIII-D. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 43. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026