T. C. Luce

6.4k citations
122 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 33

T. C. Luce

116 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

T. C. Luce
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.2k
  • Aerospace Engineering 869
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 903
Replace E. Joffrin with:
E. Joffrin France
J. R. Ferron United States
G. Giruzzi France
E. A. Lazarus United States
D. Mazon France
R. J. Buttery United Kingdom
M. Murakami United States
M. Okabayashi United States
F. Leuterer Germany
J. Snipes United States
T. C. Luce relative to E. Joffrin France E. Joffrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E. Joffrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. C. Luce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. C. Luce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. C. Luce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. C. Luce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. C. Luce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. C. Luce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. C. Luce. The network helps show where T. C. Luce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. C. Luce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. C. Luce Line = papers co-authored together T. C. Luce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3
The new stable ITER Baseline Scenario with zero torque
20181
4
Exploring an Alternate Approach to Q =10 in ITER
20171
5 201712
6 201610
7
Role of MHD Dynamo in the Formation of 3D Equilibria in Fusion Plasmas
20162
8 201529
9
Extending the Physics Basis of ITER Baseline Scenario Stability to Zero Input Torque
20141
10 201245
11 201043
12 200969
13 200753
14
100% NONINDUCTIVE OPERATION AT HIGH BETA USING OFF-AXIS ECCD
20034
15 200320
16 200253
17 199720
18 199499
19 199230
20 198818

About T. C. Luce

T. C. Luce is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 122 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (116 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (52 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (43 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (33 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (32 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (31 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (10 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k citations), Aerospace Engineering (869 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (903 citations). T. C. Luce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. C. Petty, M. R. Wade, Peter Politzer, J.R. Ferron, M.L. Walker, Eugenio Schuster, R.J. La Haye, David Humphreys, J. R. Ferron and J.C.M. de Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, Physical Review Letters, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Fusion Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026