Citations per year, relative to Gilbert Cockton Gilbert Cockton (= 1×)
peers
Arnold Vermeeren
Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Cockton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Cockton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Cockton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Cockton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Cockton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Cockton. The network helps show where Gilbert Cockton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilbert Cockton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilbert Cockton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilbert Cockton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gilbert Cockton. Gilbert Cockton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cockton, Gilbert. (2014). A critical, creative UX community: CLUF. Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland). 10(1). 1–16.4 indexed citations
2.
Cockton, Gilbert. (2012). Making Designing Worth Worth Designing. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).6 indexed citations
3.
Cockton, Gilbert. (2011). Domain Values and Method Transferability: an Initial Framework. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
4.
Cockton, Gilbert & Alan Woolrych. (2009). Comparing Usability Evaluation Methods: Strategies and Implementation, Final Report of COST 294 Working Group 2. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).3 indexed citations
5.
Cockton, Gilbert. (2008). Load while Aiming; Hit?. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 17–23.1 indexed citations
Cockton, Gilbert. (2000). Getting through the war between usability and aesthetics: beyond Freudian projection. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
12.
Cockton, Gilbert, et al.. (2000). Yes/No - A mind operated device for severely motor impaired persons. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 76(3). 143–150.3 indexed citations
Cockton, Gilbert, et al.. (1999). A Framework for Usability Problem Extraction.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 344–352.38 indexed citations
15.
Cockton, Gilbert, et al.. (1999). Using contextual information effectively in design. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 574–581.4 indexed citations
16.
Cockton, Gilbert. (1998). Let’s Get It all Together: Literate Development and the Integration of HCI Research. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).2 indexed citations
17.
Cockton, Gilbert, et al.. (1998). What’s the problem with usability problems?. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
Cockton, Gilbert, Stephen Draper, & George R. S. Weir. (1994). People and computers IX : proceedings of HCI '94, Glasgow, August 1994. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Cockton, Gilbert. (1990). Designing abstractions for communication control. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 233–271.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.