International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
About
In The Last Decade
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
3.0k papers receiving 51.8k citations
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction more than expected).
- An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale (2008)
- IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use (1995)
- The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future (2018)
- A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? (2015)
- Usability Ratings for Everyday Products Measured With the System Usability Scale (2013)
- A Systematic Review of a Virtual Reality System from the Perspective of User Experience (2019)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.