George Weaver

546 citations
53 papers · 374 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

George Weaver

49 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

George Weaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 112
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • General Psychology 4
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 42
Replace Luc Rodet with:
Luc Rodet France
Erich Goldmeier United States
Maithilee Kunda United States
Michael R. Houck United States
William Eddy United States
G. A. Whitmarsh United States
Florian Schwarz United States
Elizabeth E. Johns Canada
Rainer Dietrich Germany
David Isenberg United States
George Weaver relative to Luc Rodet France Luc Rodet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Luc Rodet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Weaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Weaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Weaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Weaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Weaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Weaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Weaver. The network helps show where George Weaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside George Weaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Weaver Line = papers co-authored together George Weaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200457
2 197447
3 197837
4 196523
5 199321
6 196521
7 197319
8 199613
9 197112
10 196910
11 20039
12 19686
13 19696
14 19516
15 19745
16 19805
17 19745
18 19704
19 19724
20 19694

About George Weaver

George Weaver is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Geometry and Topology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (15 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (10 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (8 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (112 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (42 citations). George Weaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claudia J. Stanny, Rudolph W. Schulz, Peter F. Delaney, Rajan Mahadevan, K. Anders Ericsson, Darryl Bruce, Jay R. Kostman, Melinda C. R. Burgess, John Corcoran and Marion Clawson. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Studia Logica, The Journal of General Psychology, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact