The Journal of General Psychology

2.5k papers and 29.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in The Journal of General Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 29.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of General Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (673 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (566 papers) and Social Psychology (549 papers) specifically the topics of Memory Processes and Influences (175 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (162 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of General Psychology are Donald I. Templer, W. A. Bousfield, Richard A. Charter, R. B. Ammons, Ronald G. Downey, Garvin Chastain, J. Jolles, Nico Brand, Jon K. Maner and Austin Nichols.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of General Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of General Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of General Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of General Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of General Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of General Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of General Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025