George Skavdis
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Trisha NortonDimitris KioussisKathleen RoderickMauro TolainiNicola HarkerKeith L. WilliamsAlexandre J. PotocnikJasper de Boer
- Topics
- Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers)Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers)
- Cited by
- ImmunologyInsect ScienceHematology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe EMBO Journal
- Partner nations
- GreeceUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
George Skavdis
29 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Molecular Biology 567
- Immunology 333
- Plant Science 175
- Insect Science 163
- Genetics 134
Countries citing papers authored by George Skavdis
This map shows the geographic impact of George Skavdis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Skavdis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Skavdis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Skavdis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Skavdis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Skavdis. The network helps show where George Skavdis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Skavdis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Skavdis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Skavdis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Skavdis. George Skavdis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | Transgenic mice with hematopoietic and lymphoid specific expression of Crebreakdown → | 582 |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About George Skavdis
George Skavdis is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Food Science and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (333 citations), Insect Science (163 citations) and Hematology (122 citations). George Skavdis has collaborated with scholars based in Greece, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Trisha Norton, Dimitris Kioussis, Kathleen Roderick, Mauro Tolaini, Nicola Harker, Keith L. Williams, Alexandre J. Potocnik, Jasper de Boer, Adam Williams and Mark Coles. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.