Countries citing papers authored by Edith Ackermann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Ackermann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Ackermann. The network helps show where Edith Ackermann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Ackermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Ackermann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Ackermann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Ackermann. Edith Ackermann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ackermann, Edith, et al.. (2016). Microgravity Playscapes: Play in Long-Term Space Missions.. 8(2). 157–177.2 indexed citations
2.
Xiao, Xiao, et al.. (2016). Andantino. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 37–45.22 indexed citations
3.
Ackermann, Edith. (2015). Amusement, Delight, and Whimsy: Humor Has Its Reasons that Reason Cannot Ignore. Constructivist Foundations. 10(3). 405–411.5 indexed citations
4.
Gordon, Michal, Edith Ackermann, & Cynthia Breazeal. (2015). Social Robot Toolkit. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 67–68.8 indexed citations
Gauntlett, David, et al.. (2012). The future of learning. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).1 indexed citations
8.
Glasersfeld, Ernst von & Edith Ackermann. (2011). Reflections on the Concept of Experience and the Role of Consciousness. Unfinished Fragments. Constructivist Foundations. 6(2). 193–203.4 indexed citations
9.
Gauntlett, David, et al.. (2011). The future of play.1 indexed citations
10.
Blikstein, Paulo, Leah Buechley, Michael Horn, Hayes Raffle, & Edith Ackermann. (2010). A new age in tangible computational interfaces for learning. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 125–132.4 indexed citations
11.
Gauntlett, David, et al.. (2010). Defining systematic creativity in the digital realm. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).6 indexed citations
12.
Gauntlett, David, et al.. (2009). Defining systematic creativity. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).13 indexed citations
Cavallo, David, Anindita Basu, John Maloney, et al.. (2004). RoBallet: exploring learning through expression in the arts through constructing in a technologically immersive environment. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 105–112.8 indexed citations
Ackermann, Edith. (1998). New Trends in Cognitive Development: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions.. Learning and Instruction. 8(4).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.