Edith Ackermann

37 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Edith Ackermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Human-Computer Interaction 110
  • Computer Science Applications 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
  • Education 94
  • Museology 10
Replace Carol Strohecker with:
Carol Strohecker United States
Hilary Smith United Kingdom
Girlie C. Delacruz United States
Jaime Montemayor United States
Elisa Rubegni United Kingdom
Eric Harris United Kingdom
Stamatina Anastopoulou United Kingdom
Gökçe Elif Baykal Türkiye
Tracy Fullerton United States
Pedro Branco Portugal
Edith Ackermann relative to Carol Strohecker United States Carol Strohecker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Carol Strohecker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Ackermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Ackermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Ackermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Ackermann. The network helps show where Edith Ackermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Ackermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Ackermann Line = papers co-authored together Edith Ackermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201248
2 199842
3 200535
4 200024
5 201623
6 201622
7 201520
8
Defining systematic creativity
200913
9 200113
10
RoBallet: exploring learning through expression in the arts through constructing in a technologically immersive environment
20048
11 20158
12 20138
13 20098
14
New Trends in Cognitive Development: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions.
19986
15
Defining systematic creativity in the digital realm
20106
16 20136
17 20015
18
Amusement, Delight, and Whimsy: Humor Has Its Reasons that Reason Cannot Ignore
20155
19 20135
20 20155

About Edith Ackermann

Edith Ackermann is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, General Arts and Humanities, Human-Computer Interaction, Architecture and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (4 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (110 citations), Computer Science Applications (79 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations), Education (94 citations) and Museology (10 citations). Edith Ackermann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Narcís Parés, Michal Gordon, Laura Malinverni, Cynthia Breazeal, David Gauntlett, William L. Porter, Xiao Xiao, John Haymaker, Hiroshi Ishii and Françoise Decortis. Their work appears in journals such as Constructivist Foundations, Human Development, Learning and Instruction, Design Studies and Journal of Adult Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026