Gail L. Sunderman

1.2k total citations
42 papers, 753 citations indexed

About

Gail L. Sunderman is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Gail L. Sunderman has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 753 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Education, 12 papers in Information Systems and Management and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Gail L. Sunderman's work include School Choice and Performance (29 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (12 papers) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (9 papers). Gail L. Sunderman is often cited by papers focused on School Choice and Performance (29 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (12 papers) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (9 papers). Gail L. Sunderman collaborates with scholars based in United States. Gail L. Sunderman's co-authors include James S. Kim, Heinrich Mintrop, Gary Orfield, Jimmy Kim, Kenneth K. Wong, Ann Marie Deer Owens, Ariel H. Bierbaum, Sheri Parks, Gerrit‐Jan Knaap and Laurence E. Lynn and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Researcher, Harvard Educational Review and Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

In The Last Decade

Gail L. Sunderman

37 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gail L. Sunderman United States 14 602 197 113 98 68 42 753
Heinrich Mintrop United States 14 558 0.9× 275 1.4× 116 1.0× 69 0.7× 102 1.5× 35 708
Betheny Gross United States 14 633 1.1× 138 0.7× 113 1.0× 29 0.3× 27 0.4× 50 738
Theodore J. Kowalski United States 17 539 0.9× 136 0.7× 87 0.8× 33 0.3× 32 0.5× 66 702
Stacey A. Rutledge United States 16 741 1.2× 316 1.6× 151 1.3× 43 0.4× 76 1.1× 38 860
Marisa Cannata United States 17 841 1.4× 325 1.6× 92 0.8× 35 0.4× 108 1.6× 49 1.0k
Donald J. Peurach United States 16 605 1.0× 421 2.1× 91 0.8× 50 0.5× 235 3.5× 35 830
Morgaen L. Donaldson United States 18 1.1k 1.8× 406 2.1× 163 1.4× 34 0.3× 107 1.6× 54 1.2k
Gary Miron United States 16 686 1.1× 65 0.3× 214 1.9× 82 0.8× 15 0.2× 56 796
Rebecca Jacobsen United States 15 327 0.5× 79 0.4× 192 1.7× 131 1.3× 24 0.4× 40 536
Joel R. Malin United States 13 326 0.5× 112 0.6× 71 0.6× 42 0.4× 66 1.0× 53 468

Countries citing papers authored by Gail L. Sunderman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail L. Sunderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail L. Sunderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail L. Sunderman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail L. Sunderman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail L. Sunderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail L. Sunderman. The network helps show where Gail L. Sunderman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail L. Sunderman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail L. Sunderman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail L. Sunderman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gail L. Sunderman. Gail L. Sunderman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bierbaum, Ariel H., et al.. (2019). Toward Engaged, Equitable, and Smart Communities: Lessons From West Baltimore. Housing Policy Debate. 31(1). 93–111. 13 indexed citations
2.
Sunderman, Gail L.. (2017). NEPC Review: Leveraging ESSA to Support Quality-School Growth. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder). 1 indexed citations
3.
Sunderman, Gail L., et al.. (2017). School Closure as a Strategy to Remedy Low Performance. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder). 9 indexed citations
4.
Sunderman, Gail L.. (2010). Evidence of the Impact of School Reform on Systems Governance and Educational Bureaucracies in the United States. Review of Research in Education. 34(1). 226–253. 15 indexed citations
5.
Mintrop, Heinrich, Gail L. Sunderman, & Gary Orfield. (2009). Why High Stakes Accountability Sounds Good But Doesn‘t Work— And Why We Keep on Doing It Anyway. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9 indexed citations
6.
Sunderman, Gail L., et al.. (2009). Does Closing Schools Cause Educational Harm? A Review of the Research. Information Brief.. 5 indexed citations
7.
Wong, Kenneth K. & Gail L. Sunderman. (2007). Education Accountability as a Presidential Priority: No Child Left Behind and the Bush Presidency. Publius The Journal of Federalism. 37(3). 333–350. 29 indexed citations
8.
Sunderman, Gail L. & James S. Kim. (2007). The Expansion of Federal Power and the Politics of Implementing the No Child Left behind Act. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 109(5). 1057–1085. 37 indexed citations
9.
Sunderman, Gail L. & Gary Orfield. (2007). Do States Have the Capacity to Meet the NCLB Mandates?. Phi Delta Kappan. 89(2). 137–139. 8 indexed citations
10.
Sunderman, Gail L., Gary Orfield, & James S. Kim. (2006). Flawed Assumptions: How No Child Left Behind Fails Principals.. Principal leadership. 6(8). 16–19. 5 indexed citations
11.
Sunderman, Gail L. & Gary Orfield. (2006). Domesticating a Revolution: No Child Left Behind Reforms and State Administrative Response. Harvard Educational Review. 76(4). 526–556. 31 indexed citations
12.
Sunderman, Gail L.. (2006). The Unraveling of No Child Left Behind: How Negotiated Changes Transform the Law.. 36 indexed citations
13.
Sunderman, Gail L., James S. Kim, & Gary Orfield. (2005). Nclb Meets School Realities: Lessons From The Field. 62 indexed citations
14.
Kim, Jimmy, et al.. (2005). Limited English Proficient Students: Increased Accountability Under NCLB. Policy Brief.. 1 indexed citations
15.
Sunderman, Gail L. & Jimmy Kim. (2004). Expansion of Federal Power in American Education: Federal-State Relationships Under the "No Child Left Behind Act," Year One.. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 11 indexed citations
16.
Sunderman, Gail L.. (2003). Implementing a Major Educational Reform. No Child Left Behind and Federal-State Relationships: First Impressions.. 20(7). 600–1. 2 indexed citations
17.
Sunderman, Gail L., et al.. (2001). Influence of State Policy on Standards and School Practices: A Comparison of Three Urban Districts.. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wong, Kenneth K. & Gail L. Sunderman. (2001). How Bureaucratic Are Big-City School Systems?. Peabody Journal of Education. 76(3). 14–40.
19.
Wong, Kenneth K. & Gail L. Sunderman. (2000). Implementing Districtwide Reform in Schools With Title I Schoolwide Programs: The First 2 Years of Children Achieving in Philadelphia. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR). 5(4). 355–381. 5 indexed citations
20.
Sunderman, Gail L., et al.. (1999). Support for Reading in Middle and High Schools: Institutional and Organizational Influences.. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026