Gail Cooper

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
70 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Gail Cooper is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Gail Cooper has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Toxicology, 13 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Gail Cooper's work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (34 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (13 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (11 papers). Gail Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (34 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (13 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (11 papers). Gail Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Gail Cooper's co-authors include Robert Kronstrand, Pascal Kintz, Marta Concheiro, Martin V. Melosi, Lisa Wilson, John S. Oliver, John Paul Thompson, Robert Spears, David J. Lupton and Stephen H. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Chemistry, International Journal of Obesity and Cardiovascular Research.

In The Last Decade

Gail Cooper

67 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Society of Hair Testing guidelines for drug testing in hair 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gail Cooper United States 22 1.1k 362 326 282 256 70 2.0k
Duarte Nuno Vieira Portugal 27 582 0.5× 214 0.6× 159 0.5× 301 1.1× 186 0.7× 167 2.7k
Sotiris Athanaselis Greece 25 705 0.6× 235 0.6× 102 0.3× 208 0.7× 329 1.3× 110 2.1k
Per Holmgren Sweden 28 498 0.4× 267 0.7× 159 0.5× 294 1.0× 307 1.2× 57 2.3k
Hallvard Gjerde Norway 32 1.5k 1.3× 201 0.6× 848 2.6× 257 0.9× 373 1.5× 129 3.5k
Steven B. Karch United States 32 960 0.9× 324 0.9× 182 0.6× 755 2.7× 278 1.1× 97 2.9k
Gudrun Høiseth Norway 15 485 0.4× 206 0.6× 296 0.9× 139 0.5× 268 1.0× 37 1.3k
Oriol Vall Spain 33 289 0.3× 231 0.6× 102 0.3× 69 0.2× 261 1.0× 67 2.3k
Vilma Leyton Brazil 21 332 0.3× 122 0.3× 130 0.4× 101 0.4× 190 0.7× 73 1.1k
Guido Viel Italy 24 219 0.2× 84 0.2× 314 1.0× 214 0.8× 131 0.5× 96 1.7k
Renata Solimini Italy 16 314 0.3× 115 0.3× 65 0.2× 65 0.2× 210 0.8× 36 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Cooper. The network helps show where Gail Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gail Cooper. Gail Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Marraffa, Jeanna M., et al.. (2024). Comparing Confirmed Sodium Nitrite Suicide Deaths With Poison Center Surveillance Estimates. JAMA Network Open. 7(9). e2434192–e2434192. 4 indexed citations
3.
Akhter, Nasima, Khurshida Begum, Papreen Nahar, et al.. (2021). Risk factors for non-communicable diseases related to obesity among first- and second-generation Bangladeshi migrants living in north-east or south-east England. International Journal of Obesity. 45(7). 1588–1598. 14 indexed citations
4.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2021). Increasing Prevalence of Ketamine in Drivers in New York City Including the Identification of 2-Fluoro-Deschloroketamine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 45(8). 799–806. 12 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2020). Fentanyl-contaminated cocaine outbreak with laboratory confirmation in New York City in 2019. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 40. 103–105. 35 indexed citations
6.
Concheiro, Marta, et al.. (2019). Distribution of synthetic opioids in postmortem blood, vitreous humor and brain. Forensic Science International. 305. 109999–109999. 26 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2014). Endogenous Concentrations of GHB in Postmortem Blood from Deaths Unrelated to GHB Use. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 38(8). 582–588. 13 indexed citations
10.
McGlone, L, Helen Mactier, Gail Cooper, & Huda Hassan. (2012). Alcohol and drug exposure in infants born to mothers prescribed methadone during pregnancy. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 97(Suppl 1). A4.2–A5. 2 indexed citations
11.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2005). Validation of the Cozart® Amphetamine Microplate EIA for the analysis of amphetamines in oral fluid. Forensic Science International. 159(2-3). 104–112. 21 indexed citations
12.
Kacinko, Sherri L., Allan J. Barnes, In‐Sook Kim, et al.. (2004). Performance characteristics of the Cozart® RapiScan Oral Fluid Drug Testing System for opiates in comparison to ELISA and GC/MS following controlled codeine administration. Forensic Science International. 141(1). 41–48. 33 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2004). Validation of the Cozart® microplate EIA for analysis of opiates in oral fluid. Forensic Science International. 154(2-3). 240–246. 9 indexed citations
14.
Kolbrich, Erin A, Allan J. Barnes, Eric T. Moolchan, et al.. (2003). Cozart(R) RapiScan Oral Fluid Drug Testing System: An Evaluation of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Efficiency for Cocaine Detection Compared with ELISA and GC-MS Following Controlled Cocaine Administration. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 27(7). 407–411. 22 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2003). Validation of the Cozart® Microplate ELISA for Detection of Opiates in Hair. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 27(8). 581–586. 24 indexed citations
16.
Cooper, Gail, et al.. (2000). Changes and Challenges in Rural Graduate Medical Education: The Family Medicine Spokane Rural Training Track Experience in Colville, Wash.. The Journal of Rural Health. 16(3). 232–236. 1 indexed citations
17.
Melosi, Martin V. & Gail Cooper. (2000). Air-Conditioning America: Engineers and the Controlled Environment, 1900-1960. The American Historical Review. 105(3). 939–939. 83 indexed citations
18.
Ditton, Jason, et al.. (2000). Hair testing for “ecstasy” (MDMA) in volunteer Scottish drug users. Addiction Biology. 5(2). 207–213. 8 indexed citations
19.
Cooper, Gail & John S. Oliver. (1998). Improved Solid-Phase Extraction of Methadone and Its Two Major Metabolites from Whole Blood. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 22(5). 389–392. 15 indexed citations
20.
Cooper, Gail & Robert J. Tomanek. (1987). Model dependent behaviour of pressure hypertrophied myocardium. Cardiovascular Research. 21(5). 342–351. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026