Papreen Nahar

41 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers

Papreen Nahar
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 103
  • Reproductive Medicine 191
  • Gender Studies 108
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 204
  • Molecular Medicine 44
Replace Jones Adjei with:
Jones Adjei Canada
María Teresa Ruiz Spain
Muthusamy Sivakami India
Holly M. Burke United States
Shehrin Shaila Mahmood Bangladesh
Salla Sariola United Kingdom
Alexander Schulze Germany
Meenakshi Gautham United Kingdom
Aurélia Souares Germany
Sara Yeatman United States
Papreen Nahar relative to Jones Adjei Canada Jones Adjei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34.3×
Jones Adjei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Papreen Nahar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Papreen Nahar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Papreen Nahar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Papreen Nahar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Papreen Nahar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Papreen Nahar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Papreen Nahar. The network helps show where Papreen Nahar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Papreen Nahar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Papreen Nahar Line = papers co-authored together Papreen Nahar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000125
2 201353
3 202050
4 201142
5 201642
6 201930
7 201929
8 201429
9 201027
10 201325
11 201724
12 201022
13 202114
14 201214
15 202014
16 202312
17 202011
18
Invisible women in Bangladesh: Stakeholders' views on infertility services.
201211
19 201610
20 202010

About Papreen Nahar

Papreen Nahar is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 670 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (11 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (5 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (103 citations), Reproductive Medicine (191 citations), Gender Studies (108 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (204 citations) and Molecular Medicine (44 citations). Papreen Nahar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bangladesh and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miranda van Reeuwijk, Annemiek Richters, Keith Sabin, Anjali Sharma, Ria Reis, Sjaak van der Geest, Mohammad Aminul Islam, Leanne Unicomb, Fosiul Alam Nizame and Emily K. Rousham. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive Health Matters, PLoS ONE, Anthropology and Medicine, International Journal for Equity in Health and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact