Thomas H. Kramer

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas H. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 512
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 191
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 103
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 313
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 175
Replace G. E. Mawer with:
G. E. Mawer United Kingdom
Laura Bossi Italy
Karen M. Kumor United States
Karly P. Garnock-Jones New Zealand
Harald Bode Germany
Lisa D. Coles United States
Brian Birch United Kingdom
J. W. A. Meijer Netherlands
W. Edwin Dodson United States
Alan Richens United Kingdom
Thomas H. Kramer relative to G. E. Mawer United Kingdom G. E. Mawer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
G. E. Mawer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Kramer. The network helps show where Thomas H. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998162
2 1989122
3 200891
4 199188
5 200777
6 199266
7 199154
8 199053
9 198948
10 199345
11 199232
12 199532
13 199127
14 200627
15 200925
16 199025
17 199124
18 199023
19 201320
20 199019

About Thomas H. Kramer

Thomas H. Kramer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (18 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (512 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (191 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (103 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (313 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (175 citations). Thomas H. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas F. Burks, Victor J. Hruby, Holger Stepan, R Faber, Peg Davis, Debra J. Skaar, Mark M. Stecker, Eric C. Raps, Eugene L. Dulaney and Henry I. Yamamura. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact