Forensic Science International

10.9k papers and 241.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.9k papers published in Forensic Science International in the last decades have received a total of 241.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Forensic Science International usually cover Genetics (2.5k papers), Archeology (2.0k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Forensic and Genetic Research (2.1k papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1.9k papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Science International are Burkhard Madea, Mehmet İşcan, Pascal Kintz, Olaf H. Drummer, Erik Nielsen, Frank Mußhoff, Alan Wayne Jones, Robert Wennig, Maryna Steyn and Claude Roux.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forensic Science International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Science International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Science International.

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Science International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Science International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Science International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Science International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025