Karen S. Scott

1.2k total citations
40 papers, 873 citations indexed

About

Karen S. Scott is a scholar working on Toxicology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen S. Scott has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 873 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Toxicology, 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Karen S. Scott's work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (27 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (7 papers). Karen S. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (27 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (7 papers). Karen S. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Karen S. Scott's co-authors include Barry K. Logan, Brandon C. Presley, Susan M. R. Gurney, Sherri L. Kacinko, Fiona M. Wylie, John S. Oliver, Yuji Nakahara, Hazel J. Torrance, Amanda L A Mohr and Denise A. McKeown and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Pollution, Forensic Science International and Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Karen S. Scott

38 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen S. Scott United States 17 568 304 175 156 125 40 873
Fabio Vaiano Italy 20 555 1.0× 163 0.5× 245 1.4× 154 1.0× 202 1.6× 49 891
Madeleine J. Swortwood United States 20 590 1.0× 507 1.7× 179 1.0× 174 1.1× 163 1.3× 43 1.0k
Luca Anzillotti Italy 15 528 0.9× 166 0.5× 167 1.0× 86 0.6× 135 1.1× 27 785
Fiona J. Couper United States 19 513 0.9× 187 0.6× 193 1.1× 122 0.8× 116 0.9× 24 918
Jeri D. Ropero‐Miller United States 17 483 0.9× 119 0.4× 170 1.0× 115 0.7× 135 1.1× 51 914
Elena Lendoiro Spain 21 472 0.8× 208 0.7× 127 0.7× 132 0.8× 166 1.3× 49 1.0k
Lucia Pötsch Germany 23 767 1.4× 328 1.1× 175 1.0× 140 0.9× 153 1.2× 50 1.3k
Simon Hudson United Kingdom 20 802 1.4× 490 1.6× 348 2.0× 264 1.7× 147 1.2× 42 1.1k
Cynthia Coulter United States 19 698 1.2× 401 1.3× 99 0.6× 82 0.5× 146 1.2× 38 951
Claudia Vignali Italy 18 529 0.9× 91 0.3× 149 0.9× 105 0.7× 132 1.1× 49 783

Countries citing papers authored by Karen S. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen S. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen S. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen S. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen S. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen S. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen S. Scott. The network helps show where Karen S. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen S. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen S. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen S. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen S. Scott. Karen S. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mohr, Amanda L A, et al.. (2025). North America laboratory survey data for drug testing in drug-impaired driving and traffic fatality investigations. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 49(7). 436–441. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rodda, Luke N., et al.. (2025). Bladder Wash as an Alternative Postmortem Toxicology Specimen. American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology. 46(3). 217–221. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rodda, Luke N., et al.. (2025). Bladder wash: a proof of concept as an alternative specimen for postmortem toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 49(3). 180–190. 4 indexed citations
4.
Bacci, A., et al.. (2025). Retrospective Evaluation of Novel Synthetic Opioids and Xylazine Chronic Intake by Post‐Mortem Hair Testing. Drug Testing and Analysis. 17(9). 1516–1527. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wylie, Fiona M., et al.. (2024). Applications of Sample Preparation Techniques in the Analysis of New Psychoactive Substances. Separations. 11(9). 258–258. 1 indexed citations
7.
Scott, Karen S., et al.. (2024). The emergence of bromazolam in Jefferson County, AL: a case series. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 48(8). 566–572.
8.
Musile, Giacomo, Karen S. Scott, Daniel W. Dye, et al.. (2024). Post‐mortem formation of ethanol: Is 1‐propanol a reliable marker? A proof‐of‐concept study using an in vitro putrefactive environment setup. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 69(3). 974–985. 4 indexed citations
9.
Scott, Karen S., et al.. (2023). Drug stability in forensic toxicology. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 5(4). 9 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Karen S., et al.. (2020). A toxicological exploration of the opioid crisis. 2(6). 9 indexed citations
11.
Ciallella, Heather L., et al.. (2020). Extended Stability Evaluation of Selected Cathinones. Frontiers in Chemistry. 8. 597726–597726. 21 indexed citations
12.
McKeown, Denise A., et al.. (2014). Simultaneous Analysis of 22 Antiepileptic Drugs in Postmortem Blood, Serum and Plasma Using LC–MS-MS with a Focus on Their Role in Forensic Cases. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 38(8). 485–494. 75 indexed citations
13.
Cabarcos, Pamela, Huda Hassan, María Jesús Tabernero, & Karen S. Scott. (2012). Analysis of ethyl glucuronide in hair samples by liquid chromatography‐electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐ESI‐MS/MS). Journal of Applied Toxicology. 33(7). 638–643. 23 indexed citations
14.
Scott, Karen S.. (2009). The use of hair as a toxicological tool in DFC casework. Science & Justice. 49(4). 250–253. 23 indexed citations
15.
Scott, Karen S., et al.. (2005). Monitoring drug use through segmental hair analysis. A three year case study. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1 indexed citations
16.
Gautam, Lata, Karen S. Scott, & Michael D. Cole. (2005). Amphetamine Binding to Synthetic Melanin and Scatchard Analysis of Binding Data. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 29(5). 339–344. 14 indexed citations
17.
Ditton, Jason, et al.. (2000). Hair testing for “ecstasy” (MDMA) in volunteer Scottish drug users. Addiction Biology. 5(2). 207–213. 8 indexed citations
18.
Scott, Karen S. & John S. Oliver. (1999). Vitreous Humor as an Alternative Sample to Blood for the Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Morphine and 6-Monoacetylmorphine. Medicine Science and the Law. 39(1). 77–81. 18 indexed citations
19.
Scott, Karen S., et al.. (1999). Comparison of Solid-Phase Extraction and Supercritical Fluid Extraction for the Analysis of Morphine in Whole Blood. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 23(3). 216–218. 17 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Karen S. & John S. Oliver. (1996). Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Drugs of Abuse from Conventional and Unconventional Toxicological Samples. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026