G. William Walster

36 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

Equity: theory and research197120261989200719781973197150010001.5k

Peers

G. William Walster
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 689
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 613
  • Clinical Psychology 484
Replace Leon Mann with:
Leon Mann Australia
Stephen G. Harkins United States
Harold B. Gerard United States
Jack M. Feldman United States
Linda J. Skitka United States
James T. Austin United States
Richard D. Arvey United States
Gerrit Wolf United States
Jonathan L. Freedman United States
Eyal Peer Israel
G. William Walster relative to Leon Mann Australia Leon Mann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leon Mann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. William Walster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. William Walster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. William Walster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. William Walster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. William Walster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. William Walster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. William Walster. The network helps show where G. William Walster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. William Walster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. William Walster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. William Walster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. William Walster. G. William Walster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
m solutions good, m-1 solutions better
2
2 0
3 8
4 6
5 7
6 8
7 3
8 4
9 7
10
Equity : theory and researchbreakdown →
1726
11 5
12 8
13 159
14 16
15
New directions in equity research.breakdown →
1201
16 272
17 22
18 10
19 9
20 10

About G. William Walster

G. William Walster is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 38 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical Methods and Algorithms (13 papers), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (229 citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (689 citations). G. William Walster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Berscheid, Elaine Walster, Jane Traupmann, William G. Austin, Mary K. Utne, Elaine Hatfield, Karen K. Dion, Ramesh K. Shukla, André L. Delbecq and David H. Gustafson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026