G. H. Makepeace
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter DoltonWilbert van der KlaauwJames Foreman–PeckB. Paul MorganHeather JoshiVictoria WassMelanie JonesMichael J. Peel
- Topics
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (16 papers)Retirement, Disability, and Employment (6 papers)Education Systems and Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
G. H. Makepeace
27 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Economics and Econometrics 463
- Sociology and Political Science 200
- Education 151
- Gender Studies 143
- Management of Technology and Innovation 109
Countries citing papers authored by G. H. Makepeace
This map shows the geographic impact of G. H. Makepeace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. H. Makepeace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. H. Makepeace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. H. Makepeace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. H. Makepeace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. H. Makepeace. The network helps show where G. H. Makepeace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. H. Makepeace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. H. Makepeace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. H. Makepeace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. H. Makepeace. G. H. Makepeace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | Computer Use and Earnings in Britain | 2 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | The early careers of 1980 graduates : work histories, job tenure, career mobility and occupational choice | 7 |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 74 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 80 | |
| 17 | New Blood or Bad Blood? The Allocation of Blood Posts in British Universities. | 1 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | University Typology: A Contemporary Analysis. | 10 |
| 20 | 0 |
About G. H. Makepeace
G. H. Makepeace is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Demography and Accounting, having authored 30 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (16 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (6 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (463 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (109 citations) and Gender Studies (143 citations). G. H. Makepeace has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Dolton, Wilbert van der Klaauw, James Foreman–Peck, B. Paul Morgan, Heather Joshi, Victoria Wass, Melanie Jones, Michael J. Peel, Leon Feinstein and John Bynner. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, European Economic Review and Economics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.