G. Daniel Boon

33 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

G. Daniel Boon
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Equine 43
  • Small Animals 51
  • Hematology 73
  • Animal Science and Zoology 63
  • Virology 20
Replace Robert W. Bull with:
Robert W. Bull United States
Fumio Hoshi Japan
B J McSherry Canada
E. A. Usenik United States
Tonatiuh Melgarejo United States
Clare Knottenbelt United Kingdom
P S MacWilliams United States
H. Becker Germany
Reeko SATO Japan
Márcia Mery Kogika Brazil
G. Daniel Boon relative to Robert W. Bull United States Robert W. Bull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Robert W. Bull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Daniel Boon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Daniel Boon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Daniel Boon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Daniel Boon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Daniel Boon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Daniel Boon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Daniel Boon. The network helps show where G. Daniel Boon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Daniel Boon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Daniel Boon Line = papers co-authored together G. Daniel Boon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198271
2 198251
3 199351
4 199343
5 199340
6 198236
7 199832
8
Methodologic considerations for the use of canine in vivo aged biotinylated erythrocytes to study RBC senescence.
199626
9 198122
10 198420
11 199915
12 198215
13 200113
14 198713
15
LYMPHOSARCOMA IN A GREEN IGUANA (IGUANA IGUANA)
199612
16 198211
17 198411
18 200010
19 199210
20 19999

About G. Daniel Boon

G. Daniel Boon is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (4 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (3 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (2 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (2 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (43 citations), Small Animals (51 citations), Hematology (73 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (63 citations) and Virology (20 citations). G. Daniel Boon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include William W. Carlton, Alan H. Rebar, G. D. Bottoms, Dennis B. DeNicola, Harry C. Frauenfelder, J. F. Fessler, Timothy R. Boosinger, Jon A. Story, Alfred Moore and O. F. Roesel. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Veterinary Pathology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact