Veterinary Clinical Pathology

2.1k papers and 28.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 28.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (579 papers), Small Animals (542 papers) and Physiology (326 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Oncology Research (446 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (218 papers) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (216 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Clinical Pathology are Leslie C. Sharkey, Kendal E. Harr, Joanne B. Messick, Douglas J. Weiss, Linda L. Werner, Kathleen P. Freeman, Harold Tvedten, Mads Kjelgaard‐Hansen, A. L. Jensen and Kristen R. Friedrichs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Clinical Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Clinical Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025