Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Identification of lactobacilli from meat and meat products
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich‐Karl Lücke
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich‐Karl Lücke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich‐Karl Lücke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich‐Karl Lücke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich‐Karl Lücke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich‐Karl Lücke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich‐Karl Lücke. The network helps show where Friedrich‐Karl Lücke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich‐Karl Lücke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich‐Karl Lücke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich‐Karl Lücke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich‐Karl Lücke. Friedrich‐Karl Lücke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beck, Alexander, et al.. (2008). Herstellung von Öko-Fleisch- und Öko-Wurstwaren ohne oder mit reduziertem Einsatz von Pökelstoffen. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture).1 indexed citations
9.
Segliņa, Dalija, et al.. (2008). Sensory properties of wheat bread with raspberry marc.. 126–129.3 indexed citations
10.
Viškelis, Pranas, J. Jankauskiené, Ramunė Bobinaitė, et al.. (2008). Content of carotenoids and physical properties of tomatoes harvested at different ripening stages.. 166–171.20 indexed citations
11.
Krūma, Zanda, Mirjana Andjelković, Roland Verhé, et al.. (2008). Phenolic compounds in basil, oregano and thyme.. 99–103.16 indexed citations
12.
Juodeikienė, Gražina, et al.. (2008). The effect of extrusion conditions and cereal types on the functional properties of extrudates as fermentation media.. 60–63.10 indexed citations
13.
Kārkliņa, D., Zanda Krūma, Ruta Galoburda, et al.. (2008). Overview of ready-to-eat ostrich meat preparation method without decomposition of constituents.. 74–78.2 indexed citations
14.
Kaškonienė, Vilma, Petras Rimantas Venskutonis, Violeta Čeksterytė, et al.. (2008). Carbohydrate composition of monofloral willow (Salix alba spp.) honey.. 94–98.2 indexed citations
15.
Lücke, Friedrich‐Karl. (2003). Einsatz von Nitrit und Nitrat in der ökologischen Fleischverarbeitung : Vor- und Nachteile. Die Fleischwirtschaft. 83(11). 138–142.7 indexed citations
16.
Lücke, Friedrich‐Karl. (2000). Use of nitrite and nitrate In the manufacture of meat products Assessment of the technological necessity. Fleischwirtschaft international. 38–41.3 indexed citations
Lücke, Friedrich‐Karl, et al.. (1998). Möglichkeiten und grenzen für den einsatz der polymerase-kettenreaktion (PCR) zum nachweis und zur typisierung lebensmittelhygienisch relevanter bakterien. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. 94(6). 182–187.1 indexed citations
19.
Geisen, Rolf, Friedrich‐Karl Lücke, & Lothar Kröckel. (1992). Starter and protective cultures for meat and meat products. OpenAgrar.86 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.