Daphna Shohamy
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Mark A. GluckCatherine E. MyersKarin FoerdeNathaniel D. DawG. Elliott WimmerTor D. WagerMathieu RoyR. Alison Adcock
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (43 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (31 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daphna Shohamy
98 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
- Social Psychology 694
Countries citing papers authored by Daphna Shohamy
This map shows the geographic impact of Daphna Shohamy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphna Shohamy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphna Shohamy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daphna Shohamy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphna Shohamy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphna Shohamy. The network helps show where Daphna Shohamy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daphna Shohamy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daphna Shohamy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daphna Shohamy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daphna Shohamy. Daphna Shohamy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 230 | |
| 9 | 83 | |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | 182 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 88 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 142 | |
| 16 | 466 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 147 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Daphna Shohamy
Daphna Shohamy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 100 papers that have together received 8.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (43 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (31 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (6.3k citations), General Decision Sciences (486 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (393 citations). Daphna Shohamy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Gluck, Catherine E. Myers, Karin Foerde, Nathaniel D. Daw, G. Elliott Wimmer, Tor D. Wager, Mathieu Roy, R. Alison Adcock, Anthony D. Wagner and Russell A. Poldrack. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.