Cathy M. Stinear
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.05%
- Rehabilitation top 0.02%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Co-authors
- Winston D. ByblowP. Alan BarberJames P. CoxonMarie‐Claire SmithMelanie K. FlemingSuzanne AckerleyMatthew A. PetoeLynley V. Bradnam
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (76 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (59 papers)Motor Control and Adaptation (41 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeurosciencePLoS ONEBrain
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cathy M. Stinear
133 papers receiving 9.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Cognitive Neuroscience 4.1k
- Neurology 4.0k
- Rehabilitation 4.0k
- Neurology 1.9k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Cathy M. Stinear
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy M. Stinear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy M. Stinear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy M. Stinear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy M. Stinear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy M. Stinear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy M. Stinear. The network helps show where Cathy M. Stinear may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathy M. Stinear
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathy M. Stinear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathy M. Stinear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathy M. Stinear. Cathy M. Stinear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | An open-label feasibility study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression in the New Zealand healthcare context. | 4 |
| 17 | 105 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after strokebreakdown → | 404 |
| 20 | 65 |
About Cathy M. Stinear
Cathy M. Stinear is a scholar working on Neurology, Rehabilitation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 138 papers that have together received 9.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (76 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (59 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (41 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (4.0k citations), Neurology (4.0k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (4.1k citations). Cathy M. Stinear has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Winston D. Byblow, P. Alan Barber, James P. Coxon, Marie‐Claire Smith, Melanie K. Fleming, Suzanne Ackerley, Matthew A. Petoe, Lynley V. Bradnam, Steven R. Zeiler and Catherine E. Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.